Abstract 463P
Background
Delirium represents global brain dysfunction caused by an underlying medical condition. In cancer, it is associated with worse outcome. Antipsychotic medications have been widely used, however evidence in cancer populations is still limited with concern of potential adverse effects.
Methods
A comprehensive search was conducted among PubMed, EMBASE, Science Direct, and Scopus. Keywords used in this systematic review were antipsychotic agents, delirium, and neoplasm. Publications were limited to English manuscripts published in the last 15 years. Quality of each studies were assessed with Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS).
Results
This review included 11 studies with a total of 1,896 patients aged 23 to 99. The cancer types varied and included lungs, gastrointestinal, hepatobiliary, urological, breast, head and neck, pancreas, lymphoma, sarcoma, and skin cancers. Some studies involved patients with brain metastasis and central nervous system lesions. These studies covered different cancer stages, including advanced, terminal, and localized. The antipsychotic medications examined in this review were haloperidol, quetiapine, chlorpromazine/levomepromazine, olanzapine, risperidone, trazodone, aripiprazole, and perospirone. Both typical and atypical antipsychotics were found to be similarly effective in managing delirium, but typical antipsychotics were associated with a higher prevalence of extrapyramidal symptoms. Higher antipsychotic doses were linked to increased mortality in cancer patients with delirium. Delirium outcomes were assessed using scales such as the Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale (MDAS), Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale Palliative version (RASS-PAL), and others. Adverse events included hypotension, hypokinesia, sedation, extrapyramidal symptoms, falls, aspiration pneumonia, and urinary retention. Notably, no deaths were reported as a result of antipsychotic therapy.
Conclusions
Antipsychotic interventions to manage delirium in cancer patients consistently showed positive effects in addressing immediate distress and become a meaningful component of end-of-life support.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
602P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (Enco) + binimetinib (Bini) vs vemurafenib (Vemu) or Enco in patients (Pts) with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Andrew Haydon
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
603P - An individualised postoperative radiological surveillance schedule for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients (HK-GBM Registry)
Presenter: Jason Chak Yan Li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
604P - Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Outcomes from COSMIC-311 by BRAF status
Presenter: Marcia Brose
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
606P - BRAF and NRAS mutations are associated with poor prognosis in Asians with acral-lentiginous and nodular cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
607P - Single institutional outcomes of radiotherapy and systemic therapy for melanoma brain metastases in Japan
Presenter: Naoya Yamazaki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
608P - The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in mucosal melanomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Andrea Teo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
609P - The association between thyroid function abnormalities and vitiligo induced by pembrolizumab regarding prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma
Presenter: Moez Mobarek
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
610P - Analyzing the clinical benefit of the evidence presented at these congresses and utilizing a standardized scale to quantify it will significantly enhance our understanding of the studies showcased, allowing for more objective evaluation and interpretation
Presenter: Charles Jeffrey Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
611P - ESMO-magnitude of clinical benefit scale (MCBS) scores for phase III trials of adjuvant and curative therapies at the 2022 ASCO annual meeting (ASCO22)
Presenter: Thi Thao Vi Luong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
612P - Is the juice worth the squeeze? Overall survival gain per unit treatment time as a metric of clinical benefit of systemic treatment in incurable cancers
Presenter: Vodathi Bamunuarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract