Abstract 371P
Background
Head and neck cancers (HNCs) are a challenging disease to treat due to their anatomical complexity and high propensity for locoregional recurrence. Radiation therapy is a crucial component of treatment approach for HNCs. However, assessing the response to therapy can be difficult, particularly in the early post-treatment period. Positron emission tomography (PET) with the glucose analogue [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) has shown promising results in the assessment of treatment response in HNCs. Therefore, this systematic review is written to evaluate the role of FDG-PET/CT in the assessment of response to radiotherapy in HNCs.
Methods
A comprehensive search of electronic databases was conducted, including EMBASE, Scopus, Pubmed, PMC, and Science Direct from inception to April 2023. Studies were included if they reported on the use of FDG-PET/CT for assessing treatment response in HNCs treated with radiation therapy. Quality assessment using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and data extraction were performed independently by three reviewers.
Results
16 studies reporting on a total of 348 patients were included in this analysis. The data assessed in the included studies were diverse, including the evaluation of the diagnostic performance of FDG-PET/CT, the comparison with conventional imaging techniques, the ability to avoid neck dissections, or assessed which patient population would derive most benefit from post-treatment FDG-PET/CT scan. Despite their diversity, almost all studies have showed that FDG-PET/CT scan is a reliable method to evaluate residual or recurrent tumour within 6 months post-(chemo)radiation therapy with pooled sensitivity of 84% and pooled specificity of 90%. There was a moderate risk of bias due to selection bias. Also, confirmation of positive nodal disease at the time of diagnosis and prior to therapy is an important shortcoming in most included studies.
Conclusions
FDG-PET/CT within 6 months after (chemo)radiotherapy in HNCs patients is a reliable method for ruling out residual/recurrent nodal disease and obviates the need for therapeutic intervention. However, further standardization of the PET technique is required.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
602P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (Enco) + binimetinib (Bini) vs vemurafenib (Vemu) or Enco in patients (Pts) with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Andrew Haydon
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
603P - An individualised postoperative radiological surveillance schedule for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients (HK-GBM Registry)
Presenter: Jason Chak Yan Li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
604P - Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Outcomes from COSMIC-311 by BRAF status
Presenter: Marcia Brose
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
606P - BRAF and NRAS mutations are associated with poor prognosis in Asians with acral-lentiginous and nodular cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
607P - Single institutional outcomes of radiotherapy and systemic therapy for melanoma brain metastases in Japan
Presenter: Naoya Yamazaki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
608P - The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in mucosal melanomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Andrea Teo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
609P - The association between thyroid function abnormalities and vitiligo induced by pembrolizumab regarding prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma
Presenter: Moez Mobarek
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
610P - Analyzing the clinical benefit of the evidence presented at these congresses and utilizing a standardized scale to quantify it will significantly enhance our understanding of the studies showcased, allowing for more objective evaluation and interpretation
Presenter: Charles Jeffrey Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
611P - ESMO-magnitude of clinical benefit scale (MCBS) scores for phase III trials of adjuvant and curative therapies at the 2022 ASCO annual meeting (ASCO22)
Presenter: Thi Thao Vi Luong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
612P - Is the juice worth the squeeze? Overall survival gain per unit treatment time as a metric of clinical benefit of systemic treatment in incurable cancers
Presenter: Vodathi Bamunuarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract