Abstract 493P
Background
Mediastinal lymph node dissection (MLND) is a crucial procedure during non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) resection, but the prognostic value of 4L lymph node dissection ( 4L-LND) continues to be controversial. Here, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the associations of 4L-LND with short- and long- term survival outcomes in surgically treated NSCLC patients.
Methods
We systematically searched studies from PubMed, Embase, and the Corchrane Library up to May 1, 2023. Studies investigating the prognostic value of 4L-LND and non-4L-LND on NSCLC survival were included. Data for analysis mainly included postoperative complications, overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). We used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) to evaluate the quality of the included studies. The Q-test and I2-test were used to assess heterogeneity. The stability of pooled HRs was examined by sensitivity analysis.
Results
ix retrospective studies with a total of 4565 NSCLC patients who received 4L-LND or did not receive 4L-LND were included. The 4L-LND group had a significantly better OS (HR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.61–0.91, P = 0.004) and DFS (HR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.66–0.88, P = 0.0002) than the non-4L-LND group, especially in the subgroup analysis of PSM studies. Although no significant difference in chest tube drainage for more than 7 days rate (RR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.31–3.08, P = 0.97), hoarseness rate (RR = 1.60, 95% CI: 0.53–4.87, P = 0.51), and chylothorax rate (RR = 1.28, 95% CI: 0.58–2.84, P = 0.54) was observed, however, those who received 4L-LND had a higher total postoperative complication rate than those who did not (RR = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.09–1.67, P = 0.006). There was no significant heterogeneity during our analysis, and no potential publication bias was observed among these studies.
Conclusions
Our meta-analysis showed that the 4L-LND group was significantly associated with both survival outcomes and postoperative complications compared to the non-4L-LND group in treating NSCLC patients. However, more prospective clinical trials should be well-designed to evaluate our conclusion due to the lack of guideline surpport.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
W. Li.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
87TiP - Phase I expansion study of the tissue factor (TF)–targeting antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) XB002 as a single-agent and combination therapy in patients with advanced solid tumors (JEWEL-101)
Presenter: Mustafa Syed
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
88TiP - A phase Ib study of HMBD-001, a monoclonal antibody targeting HER3, with or without chemotherapy in patients with genetic aberrations in HER3 signaling
Presenter: Nick Pavlakis
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
93P - Efficacy and safety of fruquintinib (F) + best supportive care (BSC) vs placebo (P) + BSC in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Asian vs non-Asian outcomes in FRESCO-2
Presenter: Daisuke Kotani
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
94P - Sidedness-dependent prognostic impact of gene alterations in metastatic colorectal cancer in the nationwide cancer genome screening project in Japan (SCRUM-Japan GI-SCREEN)
Presenter: Takeshi Kajiwara
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
95P - Interim results of a prospective randomized controlled study to compare the clinical outcomes of total neoadjuvant therapy vs long course chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced carcinoma rectum
Presenter: Sandip Barik
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
96P - Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) plus PD-1 blockade in TKI-responsive MSS/pMMR metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma (mCRC): Updated results of TRAP study
Presenter: Jingdong Zhang
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
97P - Asian subgroup analysis of the phase III LEAP-017 trial of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab vs standard-of-care in previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)
Presenter: Rui-Hua Xu
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
98P - Real clinical impact of postoperative surgical complications after colon cancer surgery
Presenter: Toru Aoyama
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
99P - Extended lymphadenectomy may not be necessary for MSI-H colon cancer patients after immunotherapy
Presenter: Rongxin Zhang
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
100P - Identification of phenomic data in the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer: A UK biobank data analysis
Presenter: Shirin Hui Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract