Abstract 493P
Background
Mediastinal lymph node dissection (MLND) is a crucial procedure during non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) resection, but the prognostic value of 4L lymph node dissection ( 4L-LND) continues to be controversial. Here, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the associations of 4L-LND with short- and long- term survival outcomes in surgically treated NSCLC patients.
Methods
We systematically searched studies from PubMed, Embase, and the Corchrane Library up to May 1, 2023. Studies investigating the prognostic value of 4L-LND and non-4L-LND on NSCLC survival were included. Data for analysis mainly included postoperative complications, overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). We used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) to evaluate the quality of the included studies. The Q-test and I2-test were used to assess heterogeneity. The stability of pooled HRs was examined by sensitivity analysis.
Results
ix retrospective studies with a total of 4565 NSCLC patients who received 4L-LND or did not receive 4L-LND were included. The 4L-LND group had a significantly better OS (HR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.61–0.91, P = 0.004) and DFS (HR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.66–0.88, P = 0.0002) than the non-4L-LND group, especially in the subgroup analysis of PSM studies. Although no significant difference in chest tube drainage for more than 7 days rate (RR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.31–3.08, P = 0.97), hoarseness rate (RR = 1.60, 95% CI: 0.53–4.87, P = 0.51), and chylothorax rate (RR = 1.28, 95% CI: 0.58–2.84, P = 0.54) was observed, however, those who received 4L-LND had a higher total postoperative complication rate than those who did not (RR = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.09–1.67, P = 0.006). There was no significant heterogeneity during our analysis, and no potential publication bias was observed among these studies.
Conclusions
Our meta-analysis showed that the 4L-LND group was significantly associated with both survival outcomes and postoperative complications compared to the non-4L-LND group in treating NSCLC patients. However, more prospective clinical trials should be well-designed to evaluate our conclusion due to the lack of guideline surpport.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
W. Li.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
297P - The utilization rate of radiotherapy and chemotherapy for cervical cancer in Indonesia: Optimal versus actual, how far the gap?
Presenter: Charity Kotambunan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
298P - Managing locally advanced cervical cancer: Insights from a tertiary care center and a 3-year follow-up on outcomes
Presenter: Ambedkar Yadala
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
299P - Sexual dysfunction assessment in longterm survivors of carcinoma cervix using LENT SOMA scale
Presenter: Niharika Sethi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
300P - Assessing ovarian function in Vietnamese cervical cancer patients who underwent ovary transposition prior to pelvic radiation therapy
Presenter: Cuong Nguyen
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
301P - Correlation between cervical cancer recurrence after radiation therapy and vaginal microbiome
Presenter: Xiaoxian Xu
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
302P - Expression of ERCC4 gene and its correlation with clinical and pathological parameters in cervical cancer
Presenter: Himanshu Mishra
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
303P - Prognostic value of body composition and systemic inflammatory markers in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer following chemoradiotherapy
Presenter: Hui Guo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
305P - A real-world multicenter cohort study of lenvatinib (LEN) plus pembrolizumab (PEM) in Japanese patients with endometrial cancer: Interim analysis of GOGO-EM4 study
Presenter: Yoshikazu Nagase
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
306P - Adjuvant treatment and impact on relapse in stage IA uterine papillary serous and clear cell carcinomas: A single center retrospective study
Presenter: Sachin Khurana
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
307P - Hormonal therapy vs combination chemotherapy in metastatic leiomyosarcomas: A systematic review
Presenter: Patricia Angel
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract