Abstract 385P
Background
Although systemic chemotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) are effective for HPV-positive oropharyngeal squamous carcinoma (OPSCC), for these reasons, de-escalation therapy can be suggested as an optional therapy. However, in clinical practice, de-escalation therapy for HPV-positive OPSCC is insufficient to apply to all patients considering risk factors such as smoking. Thus, we investigated the high-risk factors associated with the treatment outcomes.
Methods
Patients with stage III-IVA OPSCC (AJCC 8th) who were treated for induction chemotherapy followed by CRT between 2004 and 2020 were enrolled. We analyzed the overall response rate, 3-year disease-free survival (3Y DFS), and 5-year overall survival (5Y OS) which were associated with clinical factors, by univariate and multivariate analyses.
Results
In a total of 105 patients, HPV-negative patients accounted for 38.1% (40/105) and HPV-positive patients for 61.9% (65/105). The median age at diagnosis was 60 years (range, 40 to 76). In multivariate analysis, a poor prognosis was revealed by a statistically significant difference in the 3Y DFS estimate for the subset of patients with ≥60 years and T4 compared with those with <60 years and T0-T3. In HPV- negative OPSCC, N2c was a strong and independent factor for poor DFS (HR 6.01, 95% CI 1.209-29.871, p=0.028). Unlike HPV-negative OPSCC, in HPV-positive OPSCC, age≥60 (HR 2.802, 95% CI 1.113-7.051, p=0.029) and T4 (HR 3.531, 95% CI 1.300-9.589, p=0.013) were independent prognostic factors for poor DFS. Additionally, T4 was independent factors for poor OS (HR 4.587, 95% CI 1.334-15.772, p=0.016). In the context of risk factors, we observed that T4 was a strong and independent predictor of poor DFS and OS in patients with HPV-positive OPSCC.
Conclusions
In conclusion, our analysis represents independent poor prognosis factors with T4 in p16 -positive OPSCC. Therefore, de-escalation therapy should be carefully determined for HPV-positive OPSCC patients with risk factors, and additional therapeutic approaches such as induction chemotherapy could be considered.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
602P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (Enco) + binimetinib (Bini) vs vemurafenib (Vemu) or Enco in patients (Pts) with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Andrew Haydon
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
603P - An individualised postoperative radiological surveillance schedule for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients (HK-GBM Registry)
Presenter: Jason Chak Yan Li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
604P - Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Outcomes from COSMIC-311 by BRAF status
Presenter: Marcia Brose
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
606P - BRAF and NRAS mutations are associated with poor prognosis in Asians with acral-lentiginous and nodular cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
607P - Single institutional outcomes of radiotherapy and systemic therapy for melanoma brain metastases in Japan
Presenter: Naoya Yamazaki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
608P - The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in mucosal melanomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Andrea Teo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
609P - The association between thyroid function abnormalities and vitiligo induced by pembrolizumab regarding prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma
Presenter: Moez Mobarek
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
610P - Analyzing the clinical benefit of the evidence presented at these congresses and utilizing a standardized scale to quantify it will significantly enhance our understanding of the studies showcased, allowing for more objective evaluation and interpretation
Presenter: Charles Jeffrey Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
611P - ESMO-magnitude of clinical benefit scale (MCBS) scores for phase III trials of adjuvant and curative therapies at the 2022 ASCO annual meeting (ASCO22)
Presenter: Thi Thao Vi Luong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
612P - Is the juice worth the squeeze? Overall survival gain per unit treatment time as a metric of clinical benefit of systemic treatment in incurable cancers
Presenter: Vodathi Bamunuarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract