Abstract 579P
Background
Dacomitinib demonstrated superior survival benefit compared to gefitinib as a first-line treatment in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients through the phase 3 trial, ARCHER 1050 study. However, there is a lack of real-world data regarding the efficacy of dacomitinib and further sequential treatments after failure of dacomitinib.
Methods
This study included patients with advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC who received first-line dacomitinib between January 2021 and December 2022 at Samsung Medical Center and St. Vincent Hospital. This study evaluated objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), safety of dacomitinib, and subsequential treatment after failing dacomitinib.
Results
In total, this study included 153 patients, with a median age of 63.7 years. Exon 19 deletion was observed in 50.3%, while the L858R mutation in exon 21 was observed in 46.4% of patients. The ORR was 84.3%. Median follow-up duration was 16.9 months, and the median PFS was 16.7 months (95% CI, 14.4, 25.2). According to type of EGFR mutation, the median PFS was 18.1 months (95% CI, 14.5, not reached) in patients with exon 19 deletion, and 15.9 months (95% CI, 12.5, not reached) in patients with L858R mutation in exon 21. Grade 3 or higher adverse events were observed in 7.2% of patients, with skin rash occurring in 4.6% and diarrhea in 2.0%. Dose reduction of dacomitinib occurred in 85.6% of patients, with a final dose of 30mg in 49.0% and 15mg in 36.6%. Among the 60 patients who experienced disease progression, 32 patients underwent tissue re-biopsy, while among the remaining, 24 patients underwent liquid biopsy. Overall, T790M mutation was detected in 40% of patients who progressed to dacomitinib.
Conclusions
This study highlights the efficacy of dacomitinib as a promising first-line treatment for patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC in a real-world setting. The detection rate of T790M mutation after dacomitinib treatment failure was similar to that of other 2nd generation EGFR-TKI.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The author.
Funding
Pfizer.
Disclosure
J.E. Shin: Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: Pfizer.
Resources from the same session
297P - The utilization rate of radiotherapy and chemotherapy for cervical cancer in Indonesia: Optimal versus actual, how far the gap?
Presenter: Charity Kotambunan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
298P - Managing locally advanced cervical cancer: Insights from a tertiary care center and a 3-year follow-up on outcomes
Presenter: Ambedkar Yadala
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
299P - Sexual dysfunction assessment in longterm survivors of carcinoma cervix using LENT SOMA scale
Presenter: Niharika Sethi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
300P - Assessing ovarian function in Vietnamese cervical cancer patients who underwent ovary transposition prior to pelvic radiation therapy
Presenter: Cuong Nguyen
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
301P - Correlation between cervical cancer recurrence after radiation therapy and vaginal microbiome
Presenter: Xiaoxian Xu
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
302P - Expression of ERCC4 gene and its correlation with clinical and pathological parameters in cervical cancer
Presenter: Himanshu Mishra
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
303P - Prognostic value of body composition and systemic inflammatory markers in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer following chemoradiotherapy
Presenter: Hui Guo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
305P - A real-world multicenter cohort study of lenvatinib (LEN) plus pembrolizumab (PEM) in Japanese patients with endometrial cancer: Interim analysis of GOGO-EM4 study
Presenter: Yoshikazu Nagase
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
306P - Adjuvant treatment and impact on relapse in stage IA uterine papillary serous and clear cell carcinomas: A single center retrospective study
Presenter: Sachin Khurana
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
307P - Hormonal therapy vs combination chemotherapy in metastatic leiomyosarcomas: A systematic review
Presenter: Patricia Angel
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract