Abstract 563P
Background
Osimertinib, the standard first-line therapy for EGFR-mutated (EGFRm) advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), preliminarily demonstrated similar clinical effectiveness to the landmark FLAURA study in the prospective, non-interventional, real-world FLOURISH study at the first interim analysis. This report presents an updated effectiveness and safety results.
Methods
A total of 500 patients were recruited into the FLOURISH study from 22 sites in China between July 27, 2020, and April 27, 2022. This analysis included 460 patients who met the eligibility criteria and received at least one dose of osimertinib after enrolment and without protocol violation into the full analysis set (FAS) for effectiveness analysis, and 495 patients who received at least one dose of osimertinib after enrolment into the safety set (SS). The data cut-off date was June 30, 2023.
Results
Of the 460 patients in FAS, the median age was 64.1 years (range: 27-88), 62.4% were female, 64.8% had comorbidities, 35.0% with CNS metastases, and 98.7% in stage IIIB-IV. The objective response rate (ORR) was 61.8% (238/385), and disease control rate (DCR) was 96.1% (370/385) in evaluable patients. With a median follow-up of 18.0 months, the 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) and 1-year overall survival (OS) rate was 79.6% (95%CI: 75.0%-83.3%) and 90.0% (95%CI: 86.8%-92.5%), respectively. In patients with CNS metastases, ORR was 63.8% (90/141), DCR was 95.0% (134/141), 1-year PFS rate was 78.9%, and 1-year OS rate was 90.1%. Moreover, patients with exon 19 deletion (n=235) had higher 1-year PFS (84.2% vs. 75.0%) and 1-year OS (93.4% vs. 86.8%) rates than patients with exon 21 L858R (n=212). Among the 495 patients in SS, 195 patients (39.4%) experienced adverse events (AEs), with 18(3.6%) of grade ≥3. AEs leading to dose interruption or discontinuation were reported in 3 (0.6%) and 12(2.4%) patients, respectively.
Conclusions
The FLOURISH study showed consistence with FLAURA in terms of effectiveness of first-line osimertinib for Chinese patients with advanced EGFRm-NSCLC in real world setting. No new safety signals were observed. The follow-up is still ongoing and the final analysis is expected in future.
Clinical trial identification
NCT04391283.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Guangdong Association of Clinical Trials.
Funding
AstraZeneca China.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
602P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (Enco) + binimetinib (Bini) vs vemurafenib (Vemu) or Enco in patients (Pts) with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Andrew Haydon
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
603P - An individualised postoperative radiological surveillance schedule for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients (HK-GBM Registry)
Presenter: Jason Chak Yan Li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
604P - Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Outcomes from COSMIC-311 by BRAF status
Presenter: Marcia Brose
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
606P - BRAF and NRAS mutations are associated with poor prognosis in Asians with acral-lentiginous and nodular cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
607P - Single institutional outcomes of radiotherapy and systemic therapy for melanoma brain metastases in Japan
Presenter: Naoya Yamazaki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
608P - The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in mucosal melanomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Andrea Teo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
609P - The association between thyroid function abnormalities and vitiligo induced by pembrolizumab regarding prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma
Presenter: Moez Mobarek
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
610P - Analyzing the clinical benefit of the evidence presented at these congresses and utilizing a standardized scale to quantify it will significantly enhance our understanding of the studies showcased, allowing for more objective evaluation and interpretation
Presenter: Charles Jeffrey Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
611P - ESMO-magnitude of clinical benefit scale (MCBS) scores for phase III trials of adjuvant and curative therapies at the 2022 ASCO annual meeting (ASCO22)
Presenter: Thi Thao Vi Luong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
612P - Is the juice worth the squeeze? Overall survival gain per unit treatment time as a metric of clinical benefit of systemic treatment in incurable cancers
Presenter: Vodathi Bamunuarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract