Abstract 98P
Background
We investigate whether the continuation of adjuvant treatment and clinical course of adjuvant treatment would be affected by the development of postoperative complications in the patients who underwent curative resection for colon cancer in a pooled analysis of two large phase III studies performed in Japan.
Methods
The study examined the patients who enrolled in 1303, phase III comparing the efficacy of 6 months and 12 months of capecitabine as adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer patients and in 882, a phase III to confirm tolerability oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and l-leucovorin in Japanese stage II/III colon cancer patients. In this study, POCs were defined as the following major surgical complication; Anastomotic leakage, Pneumonia, Bowel obstruction/ileus, Surgical site infection, Postoperative bleeding, Urinary tract infection, and Fistula. The patients were classified as those with POCs (C group) and those without POCs (NC group).
Results
2095 patients were examined in the present study. POCs were observed in 169 patients (8.1%). The overall survival rates at five-year after surgery was 75.3% in the C-group and 86.5% in NC-group, respectively (p=0.0017). Hazard ratio of POCs for OS was 1.77 (95% confidence interval, 1.23 to 2.54; p=0.0017). Time to adjuvant treatment failure (TTF) of adjuvant chemotherapy was almost similar; 6-months TTF was 68.6% in C-group and 67.1% in NC-group. Dose reduction rate of adjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant treatment suspension rate were also similar between C-group and NC-group (45.0% vs 48.7%, p=0.3520 and 52.7% vs 55.0%, p=0.5522, respectively).
Conclusions
POCs were associated with the poor prognosis, while the POCs did not affect the intensity of adjuvant chemotherapy. These results suggested that the POCs itself have negative survival impact.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
This study was supported, in part, by the non-profit organization Epidemiological & Clinical Research Information Network (ECRIN).
Legal entity responsible for the study
Japanese Foundation for Multidisciplinary Treatment of Cancer.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
341P - NUP214 gene rearrangements in leukemia patients: Case series from a single institution
Presenter: Yu Jeong Choi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
344P - Venetoclax and azacitidine compared with azacitidine monotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Azzahra Noersamsjah
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
345P - Safety and efficacy of platinum substitution in induction chemotherapy for mantle cell lymphoma
Presenter: Omali Pitiyarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
346P - An assessment of marrow-infiltrating T cells in early relapsed hematologic cancer patients after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
Presenter: Ik-Chan Song
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
347P - New targets for adult T cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATLL): A map for ATLL immunotherapy
Presenter: Zahra Rezaei Borojerdi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
348P - In-depth molecular analysis in the diagnosis of lymphomas with lymphoplasmacytic differentiation may provide a more precise diagnosis and rational treatment allocation
Presenter: Ella Willenbacher
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
349P - Overall survival and progression-free survival comparison of lenalidomide + standard therapy versus standard therapy only in indolent lymphoma: A meta-analysis
Presenter: Kevin Winston
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
350P - Intratumoural CD66b+ to predict treatment response in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL)
Presenter: Mita Adriani
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
351P - Clinical features and treatment outcomes of Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia patients: A single center study
Presenter: Devi Amelia
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
352TiP - Randomized phase III study of daratumumab (D) versus bortezomib plus D as a maintenance therapy after D-MPB for elderly or non-elderly patients refusing transplant with untreated multiple myeloma (JCOG1911, B-DASH study)
Presenter: Tomotaka Suzuki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract