Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display

439P - Randomized controlled trial evaluating efficacy of topical urea-based cream for capecitabine-associated hand-foot syndrome prevention

Date

02 Dec 2023

Session

Poster Display

Presenters

Concord Wongkraisri

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2023) 34 (suppl_4): S1632-S1645. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1388

Authors

C. Wongkraisri1, K. Chusuwanrak2, A. Laocharoenkeat3, L. Chularojmontri4, A. Nimmannit4, S. Ithimakin5

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Medical Oncology, Siriraj Hospital, 10700 - Bangkok/TH
  • 2 Department Of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 10700 - Bangkok/TH
  • 3 Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 10700 - Bangkok/TH
  • 4 Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 10700 - Bangkok/TH
  • 5 Medicine Department, Siriraj Hospital, 10700 - Bangkok/TH

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 439P

Background

Hand-foot syndrome (HFS) is one of the most common adverse events of capecitabine leading to treatment interruption or delay which may result in unfavorable oncologic outcomes. Topical urea cream could reduce degree of sorafenib induced hand-foot skin reaction. Although urea cream could not prevent HFS during early capecitabine use, the long-term results of urea cream for HFS prevention is limited. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of urea cream as a prophylaxis of HFS throughout the period of capecitabine use.

Methods

Cancer patients who received capecitabine at the dosage of at least 2,000 mg/m2/day for 14 days of the treatment cycle were randomized 1:1 to receive standard measures (avoid trauma of hands/feet and keep moisture) or urea-based cream (apply to hand/foot twice daily with standard measures) for HFS prevention. Incidence and severity of HFS were assessed by physician and by patient’s self-report at day 1 of every capecitabine cycle until 4-week following capecitabine discontinuation. Primary endpoint was proportion of patients who developed any grade HFS. Secondary endpoints include proportion of severe (> grade 3) HFS, modifications of capecitabine due to HFS and HFS onset.

Results

At median capecitabine cycle of 6, 68 out of 109 patients (62.4%) with standard measures and 60 out of 107 patients (56%) with urea cream reported any grade HFS (p=0.36). Grade 3 HFS was found in 52 (47.7%) and 44 patients (41.1%) receiving standard measures and urea cream, respectively (p=0.34). Capecitabine modification due to HFS was required in 20 patients (18.3%) with standard measures and 17 patients (15.9%) receiving urea cream prophylaxis (p=0.89). HFS resulting in capecitabine discontinuation rate and HFS onset were similar between two groups.

Conclusions

Urea-based cream could not prevent occurrence of capecitabine associated HFS, lessen HFS severity or reduce capecitabine modification as well as delay HFS onset. Topical urea cream as a HFS prophylactic measure is not routinely recommended for all patients receiving capecitabine.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

S. Ithimakin.

Funding

Siriraj hospital.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.