Abstract 283P
Background
Prostate cancer is a type of cancer that occurs quite a lot in Indonesia, In 2020, prostate cancer ranks as the 11th most common cancer with 13,563 new cases (3.4%) and the 13th leading cause of death with 4,863 deaths (2.1%). Radiotherapy can be given in low, intermediate, high, and even metastatic states. However, The treatment of choice is influenced by several things, such as risk classification, performance status, patient choice, life expectancy, and access to radiotherapy services.The first step in providing access to radiotherapy services is to calculate the level of need for radiotherapy services.
Methods
The design of this study is cross-sectional, using secondary data on prostate cancer patients from cancer registration in 2019. Data collection starts in October 2022 and ends in January 2023. The 2019 data was chosen because it better describes the normal conditions during the pre-pandemic era. The collected data was identity, age, address, and data related to risk stratification and therapy. The optimal Radiotherapy Utilization Rate (oRUR) calculation method adopts the Collaboration for Cancer Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CCORE), which uses evidence-based guideline modeling methods.
Results
Using a decision tree (CCORE), the range of optimal RUR is 75.3% (66.7–78.3), and the actual RUR is 20.3%. The percentage of unmet need for prostate cancer at RSCM was 73.43% (69.5–74.07). In addition to radiotherapy, as many as 19 (14.3%) patients received chemotherapy treatment, 10 (8%) patients received surgical treatment, 42 (31.6%) patients received hormonal therapy, and 1 (0.8%) patient received samarium therapy.
Conclusions
This considerable difference between oRUR and aRUR can be caused by several things, such as a decrease in referrals to radiotherapy, inadequate and uneven access, fear and anxiety about radiation, adherence to National guidelines, and a limited number of radiotherapy service centers capable of providing radiation with the IMRT technique.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The author.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
The author has declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
341P - NUP214 gene rearrangements in leukemia patients: Case series from a single institution
Presenter: Yu Jeong Choi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
344P - Venetoclax and azacitidine compared with azacitidine monotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Azzahra Noersamsjah
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
345P - Safety and efficacy of platinum substitution in induction chemotherapy for mantle cell lymphoma
Presenter: Omali Pitiyarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
346P - An assessment of marrow-infiltrating T cells in early relapsed hematologic cancer patients after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
Presenter: Ik-Chan Song
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
347P - New targets for adult T cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATLL): A map for ATLL immunotherapy
Presenter: Zahra Rezaei Borojerdi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
348P - In-depth molecular analysis in the diagnosis of lymphomas with lymphoplasmacytic differentiation may provide a more precise diagnosis and rational treatment allocation
Presenter: Ella Willenbacher
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
349P - Overall survival and progression-free survival comparison of lenalidomide + standard therapy versus standard therapy only in indolent lymphoma: A meta-analysis
Presenter: Kevin Winston
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
350P - Intratumoural CD66b+ to predict treatment response in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL)
Presenter: Mita Adriani
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
351P - Clinical features and treatment outcomes of Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia patients: A single center study
Presenter: Devi Amelia
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
352TiP - Randomized phase III study of daratumumab (D) versus bortezomib plus D as a maintenance therapy after D-MPB for elderly or non-elderly patients refusing transplant with untreated multiple myeloma (JCOG1911, B-DASH study)
Presenter: Tomotaka Suzuki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract