Abstract 555P
Background
Approximately half of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients are diagnosed at a metastatic stage. Molecular testing is vital for identifying druggable mutations in these patients. This prospective study aimed to assess the quality of life (QoL) of these patients and differences in QoL between patients with or without druggable mutations.
Methods
Patients newly diagnosed with stage IV NSCLC after March 2021 from the seven public oncology centres in Hong Kong were eligible. Mutation profiling was performed using next-generation sequencing with FoundationOne CDx. QoL assessments were conducted at baseline and then at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months using validated EORTC QLQ-C30 and EQ-5D-5L questionnaires.
Results
A total of 580 patients were included. Statistically significant changes in various aspects of QoL were observed over time, including global health status (QL), physical functioning (PF), role functioning (RF), emotional functioning (EF), social functioning (SF), as well as symptoms such as fatigue, pain, dyspnoea, and insomnia (all p < 0.05). There was also significant change in all 5 aspects of EQ-5D-5L and utility score over time. Overall, most improvements in functional and symptom scales were observed in the first 3-6 months’ follow-up. Among the 241 patients with at least 3 months’ follow-up, compared to those without druggable mutations, those with druggable mutations demonstrated better QL at 3- and 12-month (mean difference (MD) 6.11, p=0.04; MD 19.56, p=0.01, respectively), PF at 3-, 6-, and 12-month (MD 12.76, p=0.001; MD 14.62, p=0.01; MD 22.55, p=0.02), EF at 12-month (MD 21.76, p = 0.001), and SF at 6- and 12-month (MD 14.51, p=0.02; MD 21.86, p=0.04); improved pain at 6- and 12-month (MD 14.44, p = 0.03; MD 36.57, p = 0.02), dyspnoea at 3-month (MD 18.23, p<0.001) and appetite at 6-month (MD 15.23, p = 0.04). They also had higher utility scores at 3- and 6-month intervals (MD 0.13, p = 0.04; MD 0.23, p = 0.05).
Conclusions
In conclusion, this study demonstrated improvements in QoL and symptom relief in newly diagnosed stage IV NSCLC patients within the first 3-6 months in Hong Kong. Patients with druggable mutations generally experienced better QoL compared to those without.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The University of Hong Kong.
Funding
Roche.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
602P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (Enco) + binimetinib (Bini) vs vemurafenib (Vemu) or Enco in patients (Pts) with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Andrew Haydon
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
603P - An individualised postoperative radiological surveillance schedule for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients (HK-GBM Registry)
Presenter: Jason Chak Yan Li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
604P - Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Outcomes from COSMIC-311 by BRAF status
Presenter: Marcia Brose
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
606P - BRAF and NRAS mutations are associated with poor prognosis in Asians with acral-lentiginous and nodular cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
607P - Single institutional outcomes of radiotherapy and systemic therapy for melanoma brain metastases in Japan
Presenter: Naoya Yamazaki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
608P - The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in mucosal melanomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Andrea Teo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
609P - The association between thyroid function abnormalities and vitiligo induced by pembrolizumab regarding prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma
Presenter: Moez Mobarek
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
610P - Analyzing the clinical benefit of the evidence presented at these congresses and utilizing a standardized scale to quantify it will significantly enhance our understanding of the studies showcased, allowing for more objective evaluation and interpretation
Presenter: Charles Jeffrey Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
611P - ESMO-magnitude of clinical benefit scale (MCBS) scores for phase III trials of adjuvant and curative therapies at the 2022 ASCO annual meeting (ASCO22)
Presenter: Thi Thao Vi Luong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
612P - Is the juice worth the squeeze? Overall survival gain per unit treatment time as a metric of clinical benefit of systemic treatment in incurable cancers
Presenter: Vodathi Bamunuarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract