Abstract 447P
Background
The addition of chemotherapy to Gefitinib improved outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with sensitizing EGFR mutations in this trial, these results have already been published. Here we analysed the quality of life (QoL) data of patients in this study to determine the impact of the addition of chemotherapy to Gefitinib on QoL.
Methods
This was a phase III randomized trial in treatment-naive patients with advanced NSCLC with an EGFR-sensitizing mutation and ECOG PS of 0 -2 receiving first-line palliative therapy. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either gefitinib 250 mg PO once a day (Gef) or gefitinib 250 mg PO once a day with Pemetrexed (500 mg/m2) + Carboplatin (AUC5) IV every 3 weeks for 4 cycles, followed by maintenance pemetrexed (gefitinib plus chemotherapy [Gef+C]). The primary endpoint was PFS; QoL was a key secondary endpoint. QoL was assessed using the EORTC QLQ C-30 and LC 13 questionnaires and their validated translations. QoL was collected at 2 monthly intervals [60 (+/-15) days]. The mean QoL scores for both arms were plotted and compared between the two arms at each time point using the Mann-Whitney Test. Sensitivity analysis was performed. The mixed linear model analysis is used to study the impact of treatment arms and time on QoL scores while considering participant variability.
Results
In the linear mixed model analysis (LMA), there was no significant impact on the global health status (QL) scores between the 2 arms (p= 0.5007). However, there was a significant change in the global health status scores in both arms over time (p= 0.0420). In the LMA there were no significant differences in the other function scales between the 2 arms. The scores for the symptoms scale had significantly improved for pain (p = 0.0351), dyspnoea (p = 0.0483), diarrhea (p = 0.0243), sore mouth (p = 0.0283), pain in the arm or shoulder (p = 0.0315), pain in other parts (p = 0.0273) improved over time in the Gef+C arm as compared Gef arm.
Conclusions
The addition of chemotherapy to Gefitinib improved survival outcomes (PFS an dOS) without a significant adverse impact on quality of life.
Clinical trial identification
CTRI/2016/08/007149.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Tata Memorial Center Research Administration Council and unrestricted educational grants from Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, Fresenius Kabi India, Alkem Laboratories, Natco Pharma, BDR Pharmaceuticals, and Lung Cancer Consortium India.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
602P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (Enco) + binimetinib (Bini) vs vemurafenib (Vemu) or Enco in patients (Pts) with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Andrew Haydon
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
603P - An individualised postoperative radiological surveillance schedule for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients (HK-GBM Registry)
Presenter: Jason Chak Yan Li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
604P - Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Outcomes from COSMIC-311 by BRAF status
Presenter: Marcia Brose
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
606P - BRAF and NRAS mutations are associated with poor prognosis in Asians with acral-lentiginous and nodular cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
607P - Single institutional outcomes of radiotherapy and systemic therapy for melanoma brain metastases in Japan
Presenter: Naoya Yamazaki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
608P - The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in mucosal melanomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Andrea Teo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
609P - The association between thyroid function abnormalities and vitiligo induced by pembrolizumab regarding prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma
Presenter: Moez Mobarek
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
610P - Analyzing the clinical benefit of the evidence presented at these congresses and utilizing a standardized scale to quantify it will significantly enhance our understanding of the studies showcased, allowing for more objective evaluation and interpretation
Presenter: Charles Jeffrey Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
611P - ESMO-magnitude of clinical benefit scale (MCBS) scores for phase III trials of adjuvant and curative therapies at the 2022 ASCO annual meeting (ASCO22)
Presenter: Thi Thao Vi Luong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
612P - Is the juice worth the squeeze? Overall survival gain per unit treatment time as a metric of clinical benefit of systemic treatment in incurable cancers
Presenter: Vodathi Bamunuarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract