Abstract 31P
Background
Breast edema is defined as a high signal intensity on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and it is an essential image phenotype of breast MRI. The purpose of this study was to investigate the prognostic implication of breast edema on preoperative breast MRI in breast cancer patients.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed the data of 899 breast cancer patients at a single institution. Patients were divided into the edema-positive group (EPG) and the edema-negative group (ENG) according to the presence of breast edema on preoperative breast MRI. We compared the clinicopathologic characteristics and the survival outcomes between the two groups. A two-sample t-test was used to determine statistical differences between mean ages, and Pearson’s χ2 test was used to determine statistical differences between all the other baseline characteristics. The log-rank test was used to compare the survival curves from Kaplan–Meier estimator. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to calculate the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI).
Results
There were 399 (44.4%) patients in the EPG and 500 (55.6%) patients in the ENG. Among patients in the EPG, peritumoral, prepectoral, and subcutaneous edemas were present in 387, 130, and 66 patients, respectively. EPG showed significantly higher rates of axillary lymph node metastasis (55.6% vs. 19.2%, p < 0.001) and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) (57.9% vs. 12.6%, p < 0.001) than ENG. Patients in the EPG showed significantly worse overall survival rate (log-rank p < 0.001; HR: 4.83; 95% CI: 2.56-9.11) and recurrence-free survival rate (log-rank p < 0.001; HR: 3.00; 95% CI: 1.94-4.63) than those in the ENG. After adjusting for other variables, breast edema still remained a significant factor affecting overall survival rate regardless of edema type.
Conclusions
Breast edema on preoperative breast MRI is strongly correlated with several clinicopathological features including nodal metastasis and LVI in breast cancer patients. It significantly affects the survival rate and disease recurrence of breast cancer patients. Therefore, detailed descriptions of breast edema in preoperative breast MRI may provide prognosis prediction and more intensive surveillance is needed for breast cancer patients with breast edema.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The author.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
The author has declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
602P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (Enco) + binimetinib (Bini) vs vemurafenib (Vemu) or Enco in patients (Pts) with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Andrew Haydon
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
603P - An individualised postoperative radiological surveillance schedule for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients (HK-GBM Registry)
Presenter: Jason Chak Yan Li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
604P - Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Outcomes from COSMIC-311 by BRAF status
Presenter: Marcia Brose
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
606P - BRAF and NRAS mutations are associated with poor prognosis in Asians with acral-lentiginous and nodular cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
607P - Single institutional outcomes of radiotherapy and systemic therapy for melanoma brain metastases in Japan
Presenter: Naoya Yamazaki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
608P - The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in mucosal melanomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Andrea Teo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
609P - The association between thyroid function abnormalities and vitiligo induced by pembrolizumab regarding prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma
Presenter: Moez Mobarek
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
610P - Analyzing the clinical benefit of the evidence presented at these congresses and utilizing a standardized scale to quantify it will significantly enhance our understanding of the studies showcased, allowing for more objective evaluation and interpretation
Presenter: Charles Jeffrey Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
611P - ESMO-magnitude of clinical benefit scale (MCBS) scores for phase III trials of adjuvant and curative therapies at the 2022 ASCO annual meeting (ASCO22)
Presenter: Thi Thao Vi Luong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
612P - Is the juice worth the squeeze? Overall survival gain per unit treatment time as a metric of clinical benefit of systemic treatment in incurable cancers
Presenter: Vodathi Bamunuarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract