Abstract 367P
Background
Radiologically defined sarcopenia has been associated with adverse oncological outcomes, with CT imaging being an expedient tool for determining sarcopenia in cancer patients. The objective of this meta-analysis is to assess the association of sarcopenia defined on CT head and neck with survival in head and neck cancer patients.
Methods
Following a PROSPERO-registered protocol, three reviewers conducted a systematic review of the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library for observational studies that reported the presence of sarcopenia in association with mortality estimates. Two blinded reviewers extracted data and evaluated the quality of included studies using the Quality of Prognostic Studies tool and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations framework. A meta-analysis was conducted using maximally adjusted hazard ratios for mortality estimates and correlation coefficients. Heterogeneity was investigated using meta-regression and subgroup analyses.
Results
From 33 studies (9083 participants), sarcopenia was associated with poorer overall survival (HR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.77 to 2.47; p = .01), disease-free survival (HR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.38 to 2.24; p < .01) disease-specific survival (HR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.82 to 3.67; p < .01), progression-free survival (HR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.82 to 3.67; p < .01) and increased chemotherapy or radiotherapy toxicity (RR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.31 to 3.95; p < .01). Overall survival was significantly poorer in studies with mean BMI <25 kg/m2 compared with studies with mean BMI ≥25 kg/m2. The observed association between sarcopenia and overall survival remained significant across different locations of cancer, treatment modality, tumor stages and geographical region, and did not differ between univariate and multivariate hazard ratios. Statistically significant correlations were observed between C3 and L3 cross-sectional area, skeletal muscle mass and skeletal muscle index.
Conclusions
Among patients with head and neck cancers, CT-defined sarcopenia was consistently associated with poorer survival and greater toxicity. Our findings are easily applicable in clinical practice, by measuring sarcopenia at the C3 vertebra on routine staging CT scans.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
National University of Singapore.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
602P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (Enco) + binimetinib (Bini) vs vemurafenib (Vemu) or Enco in patients (Pts) with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Andrew Haydon
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
603P - An individualised postoperative radiological surveillance schedule for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients (HK-GBM Registry)
Presenter: Jason Chak Yan Li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
604P - Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Outcomes from COSMIC-311 by BRAF status
Presenter: Marcia Brose
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
606P - BRAF and NRAS mutations are associated with poor prognosis in Asians with acral-lentiginous and nodular cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
607P - Single institutional outcomes of radiotherapy and systemic therapy for melanoma brain metastases in Japan
Presenter: Naoya Yamazaki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
608P - The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in mucosal melanomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Andrea Teo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
609P - The association between thyroid function abnormalities and vitiligo induced by pembrolizumab regarding prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma
Presenter: Moez Mobarek
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
610P - Analyzing the clinical benefit of the evidence presented at these congresses and utilizing a standardized scale to quantify it will significantly enhance our understanding of the studies showcased, allowing for more objective evaluation and interpretation
Presenter: Charles Jeffrey Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
611P - ESMO-magnitude of clinical benefit scale (MCBS) scores for phase III trials of adjuvant and curative therapies at the 2022 ASCO annual meeting (ASCO22)
Presenter: Thi Thao Vi Luong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
612P - Is the juice worth the squeeze? Overall survival gain per unit treatment time as a metric of clinical benefit of systemic treatment in incurable cancers
Presenter: Vodathi Bamunuarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract