Abstract 156P
Background
Atezo-Bev is the standard first-line therapy against uHCC. However, there is no globally established subsequent treatment after failure on first-line Atezo-Bev. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of second-line regorafenib in uHCC pts who progressed on first-line Atezo-Bev.
Methods
This is a phase II investigator-initiated trial involving 2 academic centers in Korea. Key eligibility criteria include confirmed diagnosis of HCC; prior treatment with Atezo-Bev at least ≥ 2 cycles; Child-Pugh A; ECOG performance status 0-1. Eligible patients received regorafenib 160 mg once daily 3 weeks on/1 week off until progressive disease or intolerable toxicity. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) according to the RECIST v1.1, overall survival (OS) and treatment-related adverse event (TRAE).
Results
Total 40 pts were recruited from Dec 2021 to May 2023. Pts characteristics were as follows: median age of 56 years (range, 36-81); hepatitis B (77.5%), hepatitis C (10.0%), non-viral (12.5%); BCLC C stage (97.5%); and AFP ≥ 400 ng/ml (40.0%). As of the date of data cut-off (15 Aug 2023), the median follow-up duration was 6.6 mo (95% CI, 5.0-8.2). The median PFS was 3.5 mo (95% CI, 3.0-4.0). ORR and DCR were 10.0% and 82.5%. The median OS was 9.7 mo (95% CI, 8.3-11.1) and 6-month OS rate was 55.0%. The median OS since the start of prior Atezo-Bev was 16.6 mo (95% CI, 11.9-21.3). When stratified according to the duration of prior Atezo-Bev (<4 cycles [n=10] vs. ≥4 cycles [n=30]), pts with ≥4 cycles of prior Atezo-Bev showed better median OS (not reached vs 3.6 mo; p=0.001) and ORR (13.3% vs 0%; p=0.009), while there was a trend for better median PFS (3.8 mo vs 2.5 mo; p=0.107). The most common grade 3-4 TRAEs were thrombocytopenia (5.0%), palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (2.5%), and fatigue (2.5%).
Conclusions
Regorafenib was effective as second-line therapy in uHCC pts who progressed on first-line Atezo-Bev. Efficacy and safety outcomes from our study were consistent with those observed in the pivotal phase 3 RESORCE trial which required sorafenib-tolerated/progressed pts.
Clinical trial identification
NCT05134532.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Bayr.
Disclosure
J. Cheon: Financial Interests, Personal, Research Grant: Bayer; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Servier; Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker’s Bureau: Eisai. H. Kim: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, Bristol Myeres Squibbb, Ono Pharmaceuticals, Boryung Pharmaceuticals, Boostimmune. M.H. Ryu: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: DAEWHA Pharmaceutical, BMS, Lilly, Ono Pharmaceutical, MSD, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Novartis, Daiichi Sankyo, AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: DAEWHA Pharmaceutical, BMS, Lilly, Ono Pharmaceutical. H.J. Chon: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Eisai, Roche, Bayer, Ono, MSD, BMS, Celgene, Sanofi, Servier, AstraZeneca, SillaJen, Menarini, GreenCross Cell; Financial Interests, Personal, Research Grant: Roche, Dong-A ST, Boryung Pharmaceuticals. R.S. Finn: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, CSTONE, Eisai, Exelixis, Eli LIlly, Merck, Pfizer, Roche, Genentech, Hengrui; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Pfizer, Roche, Bayer; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Bayer, Eisai, Eli Lilly, BMS; Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI: Roche, Pfizer, Merck. C. Yoo: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Bayer, Celgene, Eisai, Ipsen, Servier, Roche, Novartis; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal, Research Grant: AstraZeneca, Bayer, Servier; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Genentech. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
39P - Prognostic significance of hypoxic microenvironment biomarkers in invasive ductal breast cancer
Presenter: Sungmin Kang
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
40P - Intra-tumoral CD3, CD4, and CD8 as prognostic biomarkers in Asian breast cancer
Presenter: Jia Wern Pan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
41P - Brown fat activation demonstrated on FDG PET/CT predicts survival outcome
Presenter: Sonya Park
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
42P - A promising anticancer drug for triple-negative breast cancer: OZ-001 suppresses tumor growth by dual targeting STAT3 and calcium signaling
Presenter: Jisun Kim
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
43P - Performance evaluation of a combined risk model for breast cancer risk prediction in Indonesian population (TRIP Study)
Presenter: Marco Wijaya
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
44P - Pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and outcomes in Her-2 negative locally advanced breast cancer
Presenter: Amrith Patel
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
45P - Demographic determinants of pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer
Presenter: Anvesh Dharanikota
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
46P - Predicting toxicity following cancer chemotherapy by detecting transporter gene ABCB1 (C1236T, G2677T/A, C3435CT) polymorphism in breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy with anthracycline and taxane either sequentially or concomitantly
Presenter: Tanuma Mistry
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
47P - Sequencing of chemotherapy and surgery among older triple-negative and HER2-positive breast cancer patients with comorbidities
Presenter: Anvesh Dharanikota
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
48P - The impact of preoperative axillary ultrasound on the false negative rate of sentinel lymph node biopsy in post neoadjuvant chemotherapy breast cancer patients
Presenter: Byshetty Rajendar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract