Abstract 453P
Background
Evidence shows megestrol acetate (MA) may be a potential antiemetics for preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). While no persuasive clinic trails were performed to validate the efficacy and safety of MA. Here we designed a phase II trial to assess the efficacy of palonosetron plus megestrol acetate versus palonosetron plus dexamethasone (DEX) in preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting following moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC) regimens.
Methods
This was a multicenter, randomized, crossover, phases II clinical trial at West China hospital and West China Fourth hospital of Sichuan University. The eligible patients were recruited to the DEX-MA group and MA-DEX group by using computer-generated random number table. DEX-MA group received palonosetron and dexamethasone for first chemotherapy circle and then received palonosetron and megestrol acetate for second circle. The MA-DEX group received the treatment in the reverse order. Evaluating efficacy and quality of life of patients of these two regimens relatively. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR). This trial has registered with Chinese Clinical Trial Register (ChiCTR2000037447).
Results
Between June 2020 and March 2021, sixty-one patients were eventually evaluated in the study. Thirty-two patients were randomized in the DEX-MA group and 29 in the MA-DEX group. Of all subjects, 56% were male, and 44% were female. CR rates showed no significant difference in acute phase (DEX vs. MA, 85.25% vs. 85.25%, P=1.000), delayed phase (DEX vs. MA, 81.97% vs. 83.61%, P=0.810), overall phase (DEX vs. MA, 75.41% vs. 73.77%, P=0.835). Quality of life (QOL) showed significant differences in dyspnea symptom (P=0.000) and appetite loss symptom (P=0.021).
Conclusions
Megestrol acetate may have equivalent efficacy to dexamethasone in the treatment of moderately emetogenic regimen chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting, and no obvious adverse reactions occurred. Compared with dexamethasone, megestrol acetate can significantly improve the quality of life, especially in terms of decreasing the dyspnea and appetite loss.
Clinical trial identification
ChiCTR2000037447, 2020-08-28.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
602P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (Enco) + binimetinib (Bini) vs vemurafenib (Vemu) or Enco in patients (Pts) with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Andrew Haydon
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
603P - An individualised postoperative radiological surveillance schedule for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients (HK-GBM Registry)
Presenter: Jason Chak Yan Li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
604P - Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Outcomes from COSMIC-311 by BRAF status
Presenter: Marcia Brose
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
606P - BRAF and NRAS mutations are associated with poor prognosis in Asians with acral-lentiginous and nodular cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
607P - Single institutional outcomes of radiotherapy and systemic therapy for melanoma brain metastases in Japan
Presenter: Naoya Yamazaki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
608P - The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in mucosal melanomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Andrea Teo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
609P - The association between thyroid function abnormalities and vitiligo induced by pembrolizumab regarding prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma
Presenter: Moez Mobarek
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
610P - Analyzing the clinical benefit of the evidence presented at these congresses and utilizing a standardized scale to quantify it will significantly enhance our understanding of the studies showcased, allowing for more objective evaluation and interpretation
Presenter: Charles Jeffrey Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
611P - ESMO-magnitude of clinical benefit scale (MCBS) scores for phase III trials of adjuvant and curative therapies at the 2022 ASCO annual meeting (ASCO22)
Presenter: Thi Thao Vi Luong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
612P - Is the juice worth the squeeze? Overall survival gain per unit treatment time as a metric of clinical benefit of systemic treatment in incurable cancers
Presenter: Vodathi Bamunuarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract