Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display

453P - Palonosetron plus megestrol acetate verses palonosetron plus dexamethasone in preventing moderately emetogenic chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: A randomized, multicenter, crossover, phase II trial

Date

02 Dec 2023

Session

Poster Display

Presenters

Qiaoqi Li

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2023) 34 (suppl_4): S1632-S1645. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1388

Authors

Q. Li1, B. Yang2, C. Yi3

Author affiliations

  • 1 Division Of Abdominal Tumor Multimodality Treatment, SCU - Sichuan University - Huaxi Campus, 610041 - Chengdu/CN
  • 2 Abdominal Oncology, West China Hospital, Huaxi, Sichuan University, Chengdu/CN
  • 3 Department Of Abdominal Oncology, West China School of Medicine/West China Hospital of Sichuan University, 610041 - Chengdu/CN

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 453P

Background

Evidence shows megestrol acetate (MA) may be a potential antiemetics for preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). While no persuasive clinic trails were performed to validate the efficacy and safety of MA. Here we designed a phase II trial to assess the efficacy of palonosetron plus megestrol acetate versus palonosetron plus dexamethasone (DEX) in preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting following moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC) regimens.

Methods

This was a multicenter, randomized, crossover, phases II clinical trial at West China hospital and West China Fourth hospital of Sichuan University. The eligible patients were recruited to the DEX-MA group and MA-DEX group by using computer-generated random number table. DEX-MA group received palonosetron and dexamethasone for first chemotherapy circle and then received palonosetron and megestrol acetate for second circle. The MA-DEX group received the treatment in the reverse order. Evaluating efficacy and quality of life of patients of these two regimens relatively. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR). This trial has registered with Chinese Clinical Trial Register (ChiCTR2000037447).

Results

Between June 2020 and March 2021, sixty-one patients were eventually evaluated in the study. Thirty-two patients were randomized in the DEX-MA group and 29 in the MA-DEX group. Of all subjects, 56% were male, and 44% were female. CR rates showed no significant difference in acute phase (DEX vs. MA, 85.25% vs. 85.25%, P=1.000), delayed phase (DEX vs. MA, 81.97% vs. 83.61%, P=0.810), overall phase (DEX vs. MA, 75.41% vs. 73.77%, P=0.835). Quality of life (QOL) showed significant differences in dyspnea symptom (P=0.000) and appetite loss symptom (P=0.021).

Conclusions

Megestrol acetate may have equivalent efficacy to dexamethasone in the treatment of moderately emetogenic regimen chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting, and no obvious adverse reactions occurred. Compared with dexamethasone, megestrol acetate can significantly improve the quality of life, especially in terms of decreasing the dyspnea and appetite loss.

Clinical trial identification

ChiCTR2000037447, 2020-08-28.

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.