Abstract 70P
Background
The efficacy and safety of the three-drug combination of eribulin (E), trastuzumab (T), and pertuzumab (P) in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) as first-line treatment was reported. The overall response rate (complete response [CR] + partial response [PR]) was 80.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 59.3–93.2%), and the clinical benefit rate (CR + PR + stable disease ≥24 weeks; CBR) was 84.0% (95% CI, 63.9–95.5%). Median time to treatment failure with E was 9.1 months (95% CI, 4.3–13.9 months), and median progression-free survival was 23.1 months (95% CI, 14.4–31.8 months). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were alopecia (92.0%), fatigue (68.0%), and sensory peripheral neuropathy (60.0%). Grade 3/4 TEAEs occurred in 11 patients (44.0%). The only grade 4 TEAE was neutrophil count decreased (16.0%). Neither grade 4 peripheral neuropathy nor febrile neutropenia occurred (Inoue K et al Investigational New Drugs 2019; 180:135–46). We report the overall survival results and the efficacy of post-ETP treatments at 5.5 years after the last enrollment.
Methods
E 1.4 mg/m2 (days 1 and 8), T 8 mg/kg over 90 min and 6 mg/kg over 30 min, and P 840 mg/body over 60 min and 420 mg/body over 30 min were administered intravenously in 21-day cycles.
Results
From April 2016 to November 2017, 25 women received ETP therapy and 12 of the 25 survived with a median OS of 78.4 months, 95% CI 26.4-NA months. Subset analysis by log-rank test showed a significant difference (P=0.0114) and hazard ratio; 3.063 95% CI 1.002-9.361 in hemoglobulin (≥12 vs. ≤12 mg/dl), but not in estrogen receptor status and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (≥2 vs. <2). T-emtansine, capecitabine + TP, T-deruxtecan, and epirubicin + cyclophosphamide were administered after ETP with CBR of 72.2% (13/18 patients), 80.0% (4/5 patients), 66.7% (2/3 patients) and 33.3% (1/3 patients), respectively.
Conclusions
ETP therapy showed acceptable efficacy and overall survival as first-line therapy for patients with HER2-positive Japanese MBC.
Clinical trial identification
UMIN000021585.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Saitama breast cancer clinical study group.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
K. Inoue: Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: AstraZeneca, Chugai Pharma, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Kyowa-Kirin, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Taiho, Ono, Astellas, Sanofi. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
602P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (Enco) + binimetinib (Bini) vs vemurafenib (Vemu) or Enco in patients (Pts) with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Andrew Haydon
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
603P - An individualised postoperative radiological surveillance schedule for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients (HK-GBM Registry)
Presenter: Jason Chak Yan Li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
604P - Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Outcomes from COSMIC-311 by BRAF status
Presenter: Marcia Brose
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
606P - BRAF and NRAS mutations are associated with poor prognosis in Asians with acral-lentiginous and nodular cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
607P - Single institutional outcomes of radiotherapy and systemic therapy for melanoma brain metastases in Japan
Presenter: Naoya Yamazaki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
608P - The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in mucosal melanomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Andrea Teo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
609P - The association between thyroid function abnormalities and vitiligo induced by pembrolizumab regarding prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma
Presenter: Moez Mobarek
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
610P - Analyzing the clinical benefit of the evidence presented at these congresses and utilizing a standardized scale to quantify it will significantly enhance our understanding of the studies showcased, allowing for more objective evaluation and interpretation
Presenter: Charles Jeffrey Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
611P - ESMO-magnitude of clinical benefit scale (MCBS) scores for phase III trials of adjuvant and curative therapies at the 2022 ASCO annual meeting (ASCO22)
Presenter: Thi Thao Vi Luong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
612P - Is the juice worth the squeeze? Overall survival gain per unit treatment time as a metric of clinical benefit of systemic treatment in incurable cancers
Presenter: Vodathi Bamunuarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract