Abstract 377P
Background
Human papillomavirus (HPV) associated oropharyngeal squamous cell cancers (OPSCC) are known to have better treatment response and outcome compared with HPV -negative ones. Testing for p16 expression is used as a surrogate for HPV testing. While p16- positive tumours comprise of majority of OPSCC in Western population, p16 -positive tumours in Asian population have remained low.
Methods
Data of Indian patients treated at a single institute between 2016 -2023 was ambispectively analyzed for rate of p16 positivity and clinical outcomes. Staining of ≥70% was considered positive for p16. Data entry and analysis was done using IBM SPSS Statistics v21.0.
Results
Between February 2016 – June 2023, 114 patients were treated, of which 106 had SCC. Majority subsites were tonsil (50, 47.2%), base of tongue (30, 28.3%), and soft palate (15, 14.2%). Testing for p16 was done in 66 patients (62%), of which 19 were p16-positive. Smoking history was noted in 36 patients (34%). Treatment modalities were CTRT for 74 patients (69.8%) and RT alone for 32 (30.2%). IMRT was utilized for majority patients (97, 91.5%). Chemotherapeutic agents were cisplatin for 61 (82.4%, 6 (9.8%) shifted to carboplatin) [3 weekly-9, weekly-52], carboplatin 11 (15%) and cetuximab 2 (3%). Treatment was completed by 101 patients (95.3%) [2 discontinued treatment, 3 died before treatment completion due to non-oncologic causes]. At 3 months, response assessment was done for 94 patients, of which 74 (78.7%) had complete response [14/15 (93.3%) p16-positive, 31/41 (75.6%) p16-negative]; 7 patients (7.4%) had incomplete response while 13 (13.8%) progressed. At median follow-up of 23 months (IQR 11–42); 90 patients were alive, 72 (71.3%) had disease under control. Relapse was seen in 9 patients (p16-positive – 0, p16-negative – 4, untested – 5). Median progression free survival was 17 months (IQR 5-37 months).
Conclusions
While p16 positivity amongst Indian OPSCC patients remains lower than Western counterparts, p16 -positive OPSCC have shown favorable response rates in Indian patients. Association of p16 positivity with improved response rates and fewer relapses in the Indian population warrants investigation in a larger randomized trial.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Amrita Cancer Institute.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
602P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (Enco) + binimetinib (Bini) vs vemurafenib (Vemu) or Enco in patients (Pts) with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Andrew Haydon
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
603P - An individualised postoperative radiological surveillance schedule for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients (HK-GBM Registry)
Presenter: Jason Chak Yan Li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
604P - Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Outcomes from COSMIC-311 by BRAF status
Presenter: Marcia Brose
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
606P - BRAF and NRAS mutations are associated with poor prognosis in Asians with acral-lentiginous and nodular cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
607P - Single institutional outcomes of radiotherapy and systemic therapy for melanoma brain metastases in Japan
Presenter: Naoya Yamazaki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
608P - The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in mucosal melanomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Andrea Teo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
609P - The association between thyroid function abnormalities and vitiligo induced by pembrolizumab regarding prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma
Presenter: Moez Mobarek
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
610P - Analyzing the clinical benefit of the evidence presented at these congresses and utilizing a standardized scale to quantify it will significantly enhance our understanding of the studies showcased, allowing for more objective evaluation and interpretation
Presenter: Charles Jeffrey Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
611P - ESMO-magnitude of clinical benefit scale (MCBS) scores for phase III trials of adjuvant and curative therapies at the 2022 ASCO annual meeting (ASCO22)
Presenter: Thi Thao Vi Luong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
612P - Is the juice worth the squeeze? Overall survival gain per unit treatment time as a metric of clinical benefit of systemic treatment in incurable cancers
Presenter: Vodathi Bamunuarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract