Abstract 18P
Background
Hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2-) negative early breast cancers (eBCs) represent a significant health concern in the Indian population. Among premenopausal women with HR+ eBC, adjuvant ovarian function suppression (OFS) is considered as an integral component of treatment; however, its optimal utilization remains a subject of ongoing debate.
Methods
In response to identified gaps in clinical practice, a comprehensive questionnaire consisting of 28 statements was developed. These statements were reviewed and validated by a scientific committee, ensuring their accuracy and relevance to the study's objectives. A panel of 46 Indian experts and 1 global expert in the field of eBC were asked to rate their level of agreement/disagreement with each statement. Consensus was defined as achieving a ≥ 80% majority agreement among participants.
Results
Following two rounds of the modified Delphi technique, consensus was achieved on 19 out of 28 statements addressing critical aspects of premenopausal HR+ HER2- eBC management. The expert panel strongly recommends a comprehensive risk stratification approach for premenopausal HR+ HER2- eBC patients. Notably, Patients ≤40 years old are deemed high-risk candidates, recognizing age as an independent risk factor. For patients ≥40 years, a composite assessment incorporating clinicopathological factors (tumor grade, nodal involvement, and Ki67 score) is advised for risk assessment. For high-risk patients, OFS coupled with an Aromatase Inhibitor emerged as a recommended therapeutic strategy. The panel recommends a potential duration of up to 5 years for OFS, provided tolerability is maintained. In patients below 40 years of age, simultaneous initiation of OFS with chemotherapy is advised, while in those aged over 40 years, sequential initiation is deemed acceptable. Among the available LHRH agonists, Triptorelin stands out as the preferred choice, although the panel acknowledges similar efficacy across all options.
Conclusions
The outcomes of this consensus offer valuable guidance, enabling individualized and evidence-based approaches for OFS in Indian patients with HR+ HER2- eBC.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
BioQuest Solutions Pvt Ltd.
Legal entity responsible for the study
Dr. Reddy's Laboratories.
Funding
Dr. Reddy's Laboratories.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
602P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (Enco) + binimetinib (Bini) vs vemurafenib (Vemu) or Enco in patients (Pts) with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Andrew Haydon
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
603P - An individualised postoperative radiological surveillance schedule for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients (HK-GBM Registry)
Presenter: Jason Chak Yan Li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
604P - Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Outcomes from COSMIC-311 by BRAF status
Presenter: Marcia Brose
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
606P - BRAF and NRAS mutations are associated with poor prognosis in Asians with acral-lentiginous and nodular cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
607P - Single institutional outcomes of radiotherapy and systemic therapy for melanoma brain metastases in Japan
Presenter: Naoya Yamazaki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
608P - The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in mucosal melanomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Andrea Teo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
609P - The association between thyroid function abnormalities and vitiligo induced by pembrolizumab regarding prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma
Presenter: Moez Mobarek
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
610P - Analyzing the clinical benefit of the evidence presented at these congresses and utilizing a standardized scale to quantify it will significantly enhance our understanding of the studies showcased, allowing for more objective evaluation and interpretation
Presenter: Charles Jeffrey Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
611P - ESMO-magnitude of clinical benefit scale (MCBS) scores for phase III trials of adjuvant and curative therapies at the 2022 ASCO annual meeting (ASCO22)
Presenter: Thi Thao Vi Luong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
612P - Is the juice worth the squeeze? Overall survival gain per unit treatment time as a metric of clinical benefit of systemic treatment in incurable cancers
Presenter: Vodathi Bamunuarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract