Abstract 414P
Background
ERBB2 activating mutations (ERBB2m) are oncogenic drivers or resistance mechanisms in many cancer types and are targets for anti-ERBB2 therapies. ERBB2m can be identified by NGS of either tumor tissue or ctDNA. The prevalence of ERBB2m and associated co-alterations using ctDNA NGS in AC from AME is unknown.
Methods
We reviewed results of Guardant360 (Guardant Health, Inc) ordered for patients with AC from AME as part of routine clinical practice through June 2023. This comprehensive genomic profiling assay identifies single-nucleotide variants, insertions, deletions, fusions, and amplifications; for ERBB2, all exons are evaluated. Samples were analyzed at a CLIA-certified, CAP-accredited laboratory in California.
Results
Among 10,416 samples analyzed, the prevalence of ERBB2m was 3.8%. For samples with ERBB2m, 58% were from women, median patient age was 63 years (range, 23-116), and median variant allele frequency was 1.5% (range, 0.01-68.1). Prevalence was highest in breast cancer (BC; 7.6%), gynecological cancers (4.0%) and lung cancer (LC; 3.8%). The most common mutations occurred in exon 20 (53%), exon 19 (14%), and exon 8 (12%). The most frequent ERBB2m types were exon 20 insertions (E20i; 44%), S310F (10%), and V777L (7%). Thirteen E20i variants were identified, with A775_G776insYVMA (61%) and G776delinsVC (14%) the most common. In LC, the most prevalent alterations were E20i (73%) followed by other mutations in the tyrosine kinase domain (TKD; 12%), extracellular domain (ECD; 10%), and juxta-membrane/transmembrane domain (JMD; 5%). In contrast, for BC the prevalence of TKD mutations was highest (75%), followed by ECD (10%), JMD (9%) and E20i (6%). For GI cancers, the distribution of ERBB2m was TKD (39%), ECD (37%), JMD (22%), and E20i (4%). The most frequent co-mutations were in TP53 (62.4%), EGFR (12.2%), and PIK3CA (19%). Concurrent gene amplifications included EGFR (15.4%), ERBB2 (8%), and PIK3CA (8%). MSI-high was observed in 15 samples.
Conclusions
Comprehensive ctDNA NGS can identify ERBB2m including complex insertions and co-alterations that may inform therapeutic decisions for patients with AC in AME.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
S. Dawood: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Guardant Health. N. Sandhir, S. Hsing: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Guardant Health. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
602P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (Enco) + binimetinib (Bini) vs vemurafenib (Vemu) or Enco in patients (Pts) with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Andrew Haydon
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
603P - An individualised postoperative radiological surveillance schedule for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients (HK-GBM Registry)
Presenter: Jason Chak Yan Li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
604P - Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Outcomes from COSMIC-311 by BRAF status
Presenter: Marcia Brose
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
606P - BRAF and NRAS mutations are associated with poor prognosis in Asians with acral-lentiginous and nodular cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
607P - Single institutional outcomes of radiotherapy and systemic therapy for melanoma brain metastases in Japan
Presenter: Naoya Yamazaki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
608P - The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in mucosal melanomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Andrea Teo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
609P - The association between thyroid function abnormalities and vitiligo induced by pembrolizumab regarding prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma
Presenter: Moez Mobarek
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
610P - Analyzing the clinical benefit of the evidence presented at these congresses and utilizing a standardized scale to quantify it will significantly enhance our understanding of the studies showcased, allowing for more objective evaluation and interpretation
Presenter: Charles Jeffrey Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
611P - ESMO-magnitude of clinical benefit scale (MCBS) scores for phase III trials of adjuvant and curative therapies at the 2022 ASCO annual meeting (ASCO22)
Presenter: Thi Thao Vi Luong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
612P - Is the juice worth the squeeze? Overall survival gain per unit treatment time as a metric of clinical benefit of systemic treatment in incurable cancers
Presenter: Vodathi Bamunuarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract