Abstract 389P
Background
Patients with head and neck cancers often require multimodality treatments. Therefore, cross-resistance to various treatments that are employed for these patients poses a significant therapeutic problem. A better understanding of therapeutic cross-resistance could lead to methods which will circumvent cross-resistance. Herein, we explore erlotinib (anti-EGFr, TKI) and radiation sensitivity in human head and neck cancer cells with acquired resistance to cetuximab (anti-EGFr mAb).
Methods
Two human head and neck squamous cell cancers were utilized for these for these studies; UM-SCC-1 and UM-SCC-6. It has been previously reported that UM-SCC-1 is substantially more radioresistant than UM-SCC-6 (IJROBP 29 (2):243-247,1994). We have previously reported on cell lines that were created by continuous exposure of the above cell lines to 5 μg/ml cetuximab (Biochem Biophys Res Common 517(1): 36-42, 2019 and PLoS ONE 15(2) eo229077,1-14, 2020). Therefore, two cetuximab-resistant cell lines were created; UM-SCC-1R and UM-SCC-6R. Radiation sensitivity and erlotinib sensitivity were investigated through the use of standard proliferation assays and apoptosis assays as previously described (BMC Cancer 15:673, 2015).
Results
For the assessments of radiation sensitivity and erlotinib sensitivity, comparisons were made between the two cetuximab-resistant cell lines (UM-SCC-1R and UM-SCC-6R) with their respective parental cell lines (UM-SCC-1 and UM-SCC-6). It was discovered that the two cetuximab resistant cell lines were also radioresistant relative to their respective parental lines, regarding cell proliferation and apoptosis. However, the two cetuximab resistant cell lines were not cross-resistant to erlotinib.
Conclusions
Acquired resistance to cetuximab was found to correlate with radiation-resistance but not erlotinib-resistance. Since cetuximab is an anti-EGFr monoclonal antibody and erlotinib is an anti-EGFr tyrosine kinase inhibitor, further studies are underway to investigate the role of downstream signaling events that may contribute to our understanding for the lack of cross-resistance between cetuximab and erlotinib.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
J. A. Bonner.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
J.A. Bonner: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Merck Serono. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
602P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (Enco) + binimetinib (Bini) vs vemurafenib (Vemu) or Enco in patients (Pts) with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Andrew Haydon
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
603P - An individualised postoperative radiological surveillance schedule for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients (HK-GBM Registry)
Presenter: Jason Chak Yan Li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
604P - Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Outcomes from COSMIC-311 by BRAF status
Presenter: Marcia Brose
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
606P - BRAF and NRAS mutations are associated with poor prognosis in Asians with acral-lentiginous and nodular cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
607P - Single institutional outcomes of radiotherapy and systemic therapy for melanoma brain metastases in Japan
Presenter: Naoya Yamazaki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
608P - The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in mucosal melanomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Andrea Teo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
609P - The association between thyroid function abnormalities and vitiligo induced by pembrolizumab regarding prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma
Presenter: Moez Mobarek
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
610P - Analyzing the clinical benefit of the evidence presented at these congresses and utilizing a standardized scale to quantify it will significantly enhance our understanding of the studies showcased, allowing for more objective evaluation and interpretation
Presenter: Charles Jeffrey Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
611P - ESMO-magnitude of clinical benefit scale (MCBS) scores for phase III trials of adjuvant and curative therapies at the 2022 ASCO annual meeting (ASCO22)
Presenter: Thi Thao Vi Luong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
612P - Is the juice worth the squeeze? Overall survival gain per unit treatment time as a metric of clinical benefit of systemic treatment in incurable cancers
Presenter: Vodathi Bamunuarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract