Abstract 250P
Background
Seminoma is the most common type of germ cell tumors representing 95% of all testicular neoplasm with mean age at diagnosis of 39 years. The standard treatment modality for stage I/II is orchidectomy with high cure rate.There is an active debate regarding the use of adjuvant therapy in stage I/II due to the high relapse rate and potential for overtreatment with serious systemic side effects. The aim of this study is to assess the impact of adjuvant treatment in stage I and stage II seminoma comparing the young and adolescents to older age groups.
Methods
Data of 11718 patients diagnosed with seminoma stage I/II were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program from 2000 to 2020. They were grouped by age at diagnosis into younger than 25 years (young age group), 25 to 49 years ( middle age group) and older than 50 years (old age group). SPSS 23 was used for data analysis, Kaplan-Meier curve and log rank test for survival analysis.
Results
Patients treated surgically with no systemic therapy had 5-year relative survival of 99,4% compared to adjuvant chemotherapy (98.3%) and adjuvant radiotherapy(100%), P<0.0001. The middle age group had quite similar 5-year relative survival compared to the young age group and the elderly (99.5%, 99.3% and 99%; P<0.0001). In the young age group the 5-year relative survival was 99.9% with orchidectomy, 97.4% with adjuvant chemotherapy and 100% with adjuvant radiotherapy (p <0.0001). In the middle age group, the 5-year relative survival was 99.2% with surgery with no systemic therapy, 98.4% with adjuvant chemotherapy and 99,9% with adjuvant radiotherapy (p <0.0001) while the old age group had 5-year relative survival of 98.9% for orchidectomy, 97.5% with adjuvant chemotherapy and 99.6% with adjuvant radiotherapy(p <0.0001).
Conclusions
The use of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for clinical stage I and stage II testicular seminoma came statistically significant. However, adjuvant systemic therapy has very limited survival benefit compared to surgical management with no systemic therapy which discourage the use of adjuvant therapy for less systemic side effects with similar overall survival across different age groups.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
87TiP - Phase I expansion study of the tissue factor (TF)–targeting antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) XB002 as a single-agent and combination therapy in patients with advanced solid tumors (JEWEL-101)
Presenter: Mustafa Syed
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
88TiP - A phase Ib study of HMBD-001, a monoclonal antibody targeting HER3, with or without chemotherapy in patients with genetic aberrations in HER3 signaling
Presenter: Nick Pavlakis
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
93P - Efficacy and safety of fruquintinib (F) + best supportive care (BSC) vs placebo (P) + BSC in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Asian vs non-Asian outcomes in FRESCO-2
Presenter: Daisuke Kotani
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
94P - Sidedness-dependent prognostic impact of gene alterations in metastatic colorectal cancer in the nationwide cancer genome screening project in Japan (SCRUM-Japan GI-SCREEN)
Presenter: Takeshi Kajiwara
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
95P - Interim results of a prospective randomized controlled study to compare the clinical outcomes of total neoadjuvant therapy vs long course chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced carcinoma rectum
Presenter: Sandip Barik
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
96P - Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) plus PD-1 blockade in TKI-responsive MSS/pMMR metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma (mCRC): Updated results of TRAP study
Presenter: Jingdong Zhang
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
97P - Asian subgroup analysis of the phase III LEAP-017 trial of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab vs standard-of-care in previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)
Presenter: Rui-Hua Xu
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
98P - Real clinical impact of postoperative surgical complications after colon cancer surgery
Presenter: Toru Aoyama
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
99P - Extended lymphadenectomy may not be necessary for MSI-H colon cancer patients after immunotherapy
Presenter: Rongxin Zhang
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
100P - Identification of phenomic data in the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer: A UK biobank data analysis
Presenter: Shirin Hui Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract