Abstract 250P
Background
Seminoma is the most common type of germ cell tumors representing 95% of all testicular neoplasm with mean age at diagnosis of 39 years. The standard treatment modality for stage I/II is orchidectomy with high cure rate.There is an active debate regarding the use of adjuvant therapy in stage I/II due to the high relapse rate and potential for overtreatment with serious systemic side effects. The aim of this study is to assess the impact of adjuvant treatment in stage I and stage II seminoma comparing the young and adolescents to older age groups.
Methods
Data of 11718 patients diagnosed with seminoma stage I/II were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program from 2000 to 2020. They were grouped by age at diagnosis into younger than 25 years (young age group), 25 to 49 years ( middle age group) and older than 50 years (old age group). SPSS 23 was used for data analysis, Kaplan-Meier curve and log rank test for survival analysis.
Results
Patients treated surgically with no systemic therapy had 5-year relative survival of 99,4% compared to adjuvant chemotherapy (98.3%) and adjuvant radiotherapy(100%), P<0.0001. The middle age group had quite similar 5-year relative survival compared to the young age group and the elderly (99.5%, 99.3% and 99%; P<0.0001). In the young age group the 5-year relative survival was 99.9% with orchidectomy, 97.4% with adjuvant chemotherapy and 100% with adjuvant radiotherapy (p <0.0001). In the middle age group, the 5-year relative survival was 99.2% with surgery with no systemic therapy, 98.4% with adjuvant chemotherapy and 99,9% with adjuvant radiotherapy (p <0.0001) while the old age group had 5-year relative survival of 98.9% for orchidectomy, 97.5% with adjuvant chemotherapy and 99.6% with adjuvant radiotherapy(p <0.0001).
Conclusions
The use of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for clinical stage I and stage II testicular seminoma came statistically significant. However, adjuvant systemic therapy has very limited survival benefit compared to surgical management with no systemic therapy which discourage the use of adjuvant therapy for less systemic side effects with similar overall survival across different age groups.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
111P - Comparison of the efficacy and safety of fruquintinib and fruquintinib combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of metastatic microsatellite stable colorectal cancer: A real-world study
Presenter: Zhiqiang Wang
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
112P - Optimal classification and treatment strategy based on technical and oncological futures in recurrence of colorectal liver metastases
Presenter: Kosuke Kobayashi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
113P - Phase I/II study of capecitabine(C)/oxaliplatin(O)/irinotecan(I) combined with bevacizumab(B) in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)
Presenter: Kai Ou
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
114P - The prognostic role of LAG-3 expression in metastatic colorectal cancer
Presenter: Yi-Hsuan Huang
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
115P - Sidedness and survival of chemo-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer treated with lonsurf or regorafenib: A nationwide population-based study in Taiwan
Presenter: Meng-Che Hsieh
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
116P - Burden and trends of colorectal cancer in high income Asia Pacific countries from 1990-2019 and its projections of deaths to 2040: A comparative analysis
Presenter: Monika Chhayani
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
117P - Australasian real-world treatment selection and clinical outcomes for patients with left side (LS), RAS wildtype (RASwt) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)
Presenter: Vanessa Wong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
119P - Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in the mode of hypofractionation in locally advanced rectal cancer: Is it time to change standards of care?
Presenter: Abror Abdujapparov
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
120P - Improved clinical outcomes with cetuximab maintenance therapy in left-sided RAS/BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: A real-world study of Hunan cancer hospital
Presenter: Xiaolin Yang
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
121P - Single-cell sequencing reveals the role of Treg cells with high expression of BIRC3 in regulating the progression of colorectal cancer
Presenter: Yuqiu Xu
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract