Abstract 250P
Background
Seminoma is the most common type of germ cell tumors representing 95% of all testicular neoplasm with mean age at diagnosis of 39 years. The standard treatment modality for stage I/II is orchidectomy with high cure rate.There is an active debate regarding the use of adjuvant therapy in stage I/II due to the high relapse rate and potential for overtreatment with serious systemic side effects. The aim of this study is to assess the impact of adjuvant treatment in stage I and stage II seminoma comparing the young and adolescents to older age groups.
Methods
Data of 11718 patients diagnosed with seminoma stage I/II were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program from 2000 to 2020. They were grouped by age at diagnosis into younger than 25 years (young age group), 25 to 49 years ( middle age group) and older than 50 years (old age group). SPSS 23 was used for data analysis, Kaplan-Meier curve and log rank test for survival analysis.
Results
Patients treated surgically with no systemic therapy had 5-year relative survival of 99,4% compared to adjuvant chemotherapy (98.3%) and adjuvant radiotherapy(100%), P<0.0001. The middle age group had quite similar 5-year relative survival compared to the young age group and the elderly (99.5%, 99.3% and 99%; P<0.0001). In the young age group the 5-year relative survival was 99.9% with orchidectomy, 97.4% with adjuvant chemotherapy and 100% with adjuvant radiotherapy (p <0.0001). In the middle age group, the 5-year relative survival was 99.2% with surgery with no systemic therapy, 98.4% with adjuvant chemotherapy and 99,9% with adjuvant radiotherapy (p <0.0001) while the old age group had 5-year relative survival of 98.9% for orchidectomy, 97.5% with adjuvant chemotherapy and 99.6% with adjuvant radiotherapy(p <0.0001).
Conclusions
The use of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for clinical stage I and stage II testicular seminoma came statistically significant. However, adjuvant systemic therapy has very limited survival benefit compared to surgical management with no systemic therapy which discourage the use of adjuvant therapy for less systemic side effects with similar overall survival across different age groups.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
397P - Comparison between Y-site co-infusion versus standard dexamethasone for preventing hypersensitivity reactions from oxaliplatin administration: A randomized controlled trial
Presenter: jarearnjit Phavirunsiri
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
398P - Evaluation of the effectiveness of denosumab therapy giant cell tumor of the pelvis
Presenter: Abbos Nurjabov
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
399P - Long-term outcomes of patients with gastric cancer who received the best supportive care without any anticancer treatment
Presenter: Yohei Arihara
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
401TiP - Oral opioid vs intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with hydromorphone bolus-only or continuous infusion to maintain analgesia for severe cancer pain: A randomized phase III trial
Presenter: Cheng Huang
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
407P - K-TrackTM: A streamlined personalized assay to detect molecular residual disease in solid tumors
Presenter: Nam Vo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
408P - Increased EGFR and MET expression and corresponding tumor microenvironment (TME) change in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) tissues after sorafenib (Sora) treatment
Presenter: Chia Jui Yen
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
410P - Systematic evaluation of cell-free DNA fragmentation patterns for cancer diagnosis and enhanced cancer detection through integration of multiple fragmentations
Presenter: Xiangy-Yu Meng
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
412P - Multiplex digital spatial profiling (DSP) of protein reveals distinct immune and molecular phenotypes in hepatocellular carcinoma
Presenter: Chia Jui Yen
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
413P - Clinical utility of advanced features provided by circulating tumor DNA-based comprehensive genomic profiling
Presenter: Young-gon Kim
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
414P - Landscape of ERBB2 mutations in advanced cancers (AC) using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) next-generation sequencing (NGS) in Asia and Middle East (AME)
Presenter: Byoung Chul Cho
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract