Abstract 486P
Background
Our research group has previously established the cost-effectiveness (CE) of lung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) for both high-risk smokers and non-smokers in Hong Kong (HK). Integrating LCS into the existing infrastructure in HK however requires systematic and rigorous design and execution. Thus, we undertook sensitivity and scenario analyses for LCS beyond fundamental base-case examination. The aim was to explore balance between clinical efficacy and resource optimization for LCS implementation in HK.
Methods
A CE analysis was conducted using decision tree and state-transition Markov model to simulate identification, diagnosis, and treatments for a high-risk population defined by the NELSON study and the TALENT study. One-way sensitivity analysis (OSA) was conducted with ±20% variation of the base-case parameter values. Scenario analyses were undertaken to explore the CE of LCS with varying costs. The incremental cost-effectiveness (ICER) was estimated as costs per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY).
Results
OSA showed that LDCT costs were the main driver for the ICER of LCS targeting heavy smokers, 20% increase in LDCT costs led to an ICER of USD 18,002 (22% higher than base-case ICER). Meanwhile, 20% increase in the treatments costs for stage I LC led to an ICER of 10,844 (7% higher than base-case ICER) for the LCS targeting high-risk non-smokers. Scenario analyses additionally indicated that restraining costs for CT scan, diagnosis, and early-stage LC treatments would yield a reduction in ICER (Table). Table: 486P
Scenario analysis | Smoker | Non smokers | ||
ICER (USD) ∗ | Reduction in ICER ∗ | ICER (USD) | Reduction in ICER | |
Base-case analysis | $14,723 | NA. | $10,096 | NA. |
Cut down unit costs for low-dose CT scans (LDCT) - USD $ 191 | $12,070 | 18% | $9,520 | 6% |
Cut down unit costs for LDCT - USD $ 127 | $9,377 | 36% | $8,934 | 12% |
Cut down unit costs for LDCT - USD $ 64 | $6,684 | 55% | $8,349 | 17% |
Half diagnostic costs for stage I - USD $ 836 (per person) | $14,472 | 2% | $9,635 | 5% |
Half diagnostic costs for stage IV - USD $ 3,922 (per person) | $14,969 | -2% | $8,872 | 12% |
Half treatment costs for the ongoing phase for stage I patients (per 3 months) - USD $ 247 | $13,296 | 10% | $8,777 | 13% |
Half treatment costs for the ongoing phase for stage IV patients (per 3 months) - USD $ 417 | $14,974 | -2% | $10,145 | 0% |
Conclusions
Fiscal restraint on CT scanning and early-stage LC treatments expenditures are necessary to ensure feasible and sustainable LCS implementation in HK. Our findings provide important benchmarks for the HK Government’s consideration.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
AstraZeneca Hong Kong.
Disclosure
H.H.F. Loong: Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: Boehringer Ingelheim, MSD; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Eli Lilly, Illumina, Bayer, Guardant Health; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Novartis, Takeda. X. Pan: Financial Interests, Personal, Financially compensated role: i-DNA. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
62P - Combination of chemotherapy with endocrinal therapy as upfront treatment of metastatic breast cancer in hormone receptor- positive, HER2 -negative disease: A phase II randomised clinical trial
Presenter: Mariam Saleh
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
63P - Efficacy and safety of eribulin plus carboplatin combination for HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer
Presenter: Mengqian Ni
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
64P - Unmet needs following metastatic breast cancer in a middle-income Asian country
Presenter: Nirmala Bhoo-Pathy
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
66P - Utidelone-based therapy in metastatic solid tumors after failure of standard therapies: A prospective, multicenter, single-arm trial
Presenter: Jianjun Zhang
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
67P - Efficacy and safety of trastuzumab biosimilar in HER2+ve metastatic breast cancer: A multicenter phase III study
Presenter: krishna Mohan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
68P - Neratinib in combination with fulvestrant and or palbociclib can overcome endocrine resistance in HER2-low/ ER+ breast cancer
Presenter: Maryam Arshad
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
69P - A multicenter, retrospective, real-world study of inetetamab combined with pyrotinib and vinorelbine as treatment for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer
Presenter: Nan Jin
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
70P - Overall survival of eribulin, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab as first-line therapy for patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: A phase II, single-arm clinical trial
Presenter: Kenichi Inoue
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
71P - Efficacy and safety of disitamab vedotin after trastuzumab for HER2 -positive breast cancer: A real-world data of retrospective study
Presenter: Chao Li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
72P - Real-world data on the efficacy of T-DM1 biosimilar for the treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients: Outcomes from a single center retrospective study in India
Presenter: Kaushal Patel
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract