Abstract 309P
Background
Immunotherapy with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab (LP) prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced endometrial cancer. However, the predictive biomarker for this therapy is still unclear. Some studies on breast and prostate cancer have suggested that expression of hormone receptors (HRs) has immune regulatory functions. Therefore, we explored whether the HRs expression could be a predictive biomarker of LP therapy.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed clinicopathological information on patients with advanced mismatch repair proficient (pMMR) endometrial cancer who underwent LP therapy between January 2022 and March 2023 at the National Cancer Center Hospital. Expression of HRs was evaluated for estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) by immunohistochemistry. Cases were dichotomized, using 10% as a cut-off value. Expression of p53 and programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) were also confirmed. PFS and OS were compared according to the status of HRs, p53, and PD-L1 expressions by log-rank test. Multivariate analysis using Cox proportional hazard model was performed to confirm the prognosis factor.
Results
A total of 19 patients were reviewed, including four patients with carcinosarcoma. Twelve patients were ER-positive and 11 were PR-positive. Thirteen had an aberrant type of p53 expression and, 14 had PD-L1 positive (combined positive score ≥ 1). No association was found between prognosis and expression status of PR, p53, or PD-L1. However, patients with ER-positive had a significantly poorer PFS (4.3 vs. 10.0 months, hazard ratio [HR]: 3.28, p = 0.038) than those with ER-negative. Multivariate analysis confirmed that ER-positive is a statistically poor prognostic factor for PFS. Similarly, ER-positive patients tended to have a poorer OS (6.2 vs. 11.5 months, HR: 1.92, p = 0.375) than ER-negative patients. Overall response rate was 42% and 71% for ER-positive and negative patients, respectively.
Conclusions
ER expression was associated with shorter PFS of LP therapy. ER expression in tumors was a negative predictive biomarker in LP therapy for advanced endometrial cancer with pMMR.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
T. Nishikawa: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: MSD, Eisai. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
602P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (Enco) + binimetinib (Bini) vs vemurafenib (Vemu) or Enco in patients (Pts) with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Andrew Haydon
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
603P - An individualised postoperative radiological surveillance schedule for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients (HK-GBM Registry)
Presenter: Jason Chak Yan Li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
604P - Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Outcomes from COSMIC-311 by BRAF status
Presenter: Marcia Brose
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
606P - BRAF and NRAS mutations are associated with poor prognosis in Asians with acral-lentiginous and nodular cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
607P - Single institutional outcomes of radiotherapy and systemic therapy for melanoma brain metastases in Japan
Presenter: Naoya Yamazaki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
608P - The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in mucosal melanomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Andrea Teo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
609P - The association between thyroid function abnormalities and vitiligo induced by pembrolizumab regarding prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma
Presenter: Moez Mobarek
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
610P - Analyzing the clinical benefit of the evidence presented at these congresses and utilizing a standardized scale to quantify it will significantly enhance our understanding of the studies showcased, allowing for more objective evaluation and interpretation
Presenter: Charles Jeffrey Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
611P - ESMO-magnitude of clinical benefit scale (MCBS) scores for phase III trials of adjuvant and curative therapies at the 2022 ASCO annual meeting (ASCO22)
Presenter: Thi Thao Vi Luong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
612P - Is the juice worth the squeeze? Overall survival gain per unit treatment time as a metric of clinical benefit of systemic treatment in incurable cancers
Presenter: Vodathi Bamunuarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract