Abstract 38P
Background
Patients who reach pathological complete remission (PCR) after neoadjuvant therapy for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) have a better overall prognosis and do not require additional adjuvant therapy postoperatively according to current guidelines; however, some patients still have a lower survival rate.
Methods
We identified TNBC patients who completed neoadjuvant therapy and achieved PCR registered in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2010 and 2015. We analyzed the relationship between clinicopathological characteristics and overall survival, seeking to explore the high-risk factors for poor prognosis in patients who achieved PCR after neoadjuvant therapy for TNBC.
Results
A total of 1237 TNBC patients without distant metastases completed neoadjuvant therapy and achieved PCR, and their 5-year overall survival rate was 90.78%. We incorporated age, TNM stage (AJCC 7th edition), and presence of lymph node metastasis as variables to construct a multifactorial COX proportional risk model. The results found no statistically significant effect on survival time in stage II patients compared to stage I patients (HR=1.057, 95%CI 0.540-2.069, P=0.872), but statistically significant compared to stage III patients (HR=2.441, 95%CI 1.159-5.144, P=0.019). There was a statistically significant effect on survival time in patients with lymph node metastases compared to those without lymph node metastases (HR=1.913, 95%CI 1.253-2.921, P=0.003); and no statistically significant effect on survival time in patients younger than 40 years compared to those older than 40 years (HR=1.190, 95%CI 0.615-2.302, P= 0.605).
Conclusions
Younger age is not a factor influencing the prognosis of TNBC patients with PCR. For patients with stage III or lymph node metastases, even if PCR is achieved, further adjuvant therapy may be needed to improve prognosis. The type of adjuvant therapy to be used may need to be further confirmed by future prospective clinical trials.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The author.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
The author has declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
341P - NUP214 gene rearrangements in leukemia patients: Case series from a single institution
Presenter: Yu Jeong Choi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
344P - Venetoclax and azacitidine compared with azacitidine monotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Azzahra Noersamsjah
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
345P - Safety and efficacy of platinum substitution in induction chemotherapy for mantle cell lymphoma
Presenter: Omali Pitiyarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
346P - An assessment of marrow-infiltrating T cells in early relapsed hematologic cancer patients after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
Presenter: Ik-Chan Song
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
347P - New targets for adult T cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATLL): A map for ATLL immunotherapy
Presenter: Zahra Rezaei Borojerdi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
348P - In-depth molecular analysis in the diagnosis of lymphomas with lymphoplasmacytic differentiation may provide a more precise diagnosis and rational treatment allocation
Presenter: Ella Willenbacher
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
349P - Overall survival and progression-free survival comparison of lenalidomide + standard therapy versus standard therapy only in indolent lymphoma: A meta-analysis
Presenter: Kevin Winston
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
350P - Intratumoural CD66b+ to predict treatment response in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL)
Presenter: Mita Adriani
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
351P - Clinical features and treatment outcomes of Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia patients: A single center study
Presenter: Devi Amelia
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
352TiP - Randomized phase III study of daratumumab (D) versus bortezomib plus D as a maintenance therapy after D-MPB for elderly or non-elderly patients refusing transplant with untreated multiple myeloma (JCOG1911, B-DASH study)
Presenter: Tomotaka Suzuki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract