Abstract 611P
Background
The ESMO-MCBS provides a standardized assessment of the clinical benefit of a study treatment, considering factors such as overall survival and quality of life. We examined the profile of scores for trials of adjuvant therapy or potentially curative therapies presented at ASCO22 to assess the applicability of the MCBS.
Methods
Abstracts and prior or subsequent (until April 10, 2023) full publications of phase 3 trials on adjuvant therapy or curative treatment presented at ASCO22 were assessed using the MCBS v1.1 evaluation form 1. Scores were calculated based on overall survival, disease free survival or pathological complete response data and graded as A, B or C. Grades A and B indicate a substantial magnitude of clinical benefit. Two independent reviewers performed the grading; discrepancies were resolved through discussion and consensus with a third investigator.
Results
Thirty-five trials were evaluated, of which 11 could not be scored due to insufficient data or endpoint not gradable of the remaining 24 trials, 12 could not be graded due to statistically non-significant results. The remaining 12 trials were scored based on abstract alone (n= 6), or subsequent publication (n=6). A meaningful clinical benefit was seen in 11 of 12 trials (92%) with a score of A (n=9) or B (n=2), whereas 1 study had a score C.
Conclusions
Applying the current ESMO-MCBS to adjuvant and curative phase 3 trials presented at ASCO22 has significant limitations, due to the number of trials not able to be scored. This is a particular problem for studies with non-significant results. Adapting the score to allow grading of all trials may better assist clinicians and patients to assess the value of contemporary research.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
E. Segelov: Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Member: ESMO-MCBS Working Group. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
297P - The utilization rate of radiotherapy and chemotherapy for cervical cancer in Indonesia: Optimal versus actual, how far the gap?
Presenter: Charity Kotambunan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
298P - Managing locally advanced cervical cancer: Insights from a tertiary care center and a 3-year follow-up on outcomes
Presenter: Ambedkar Yadala
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
299P - Sexual dysfunction assessment in longterm survivors of carcinoma cervix using LENT SOMA scale
Presenter: Niharika Sethi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
300P - Assessing ovarian function in Vietnamese cervical cancer patients who underwent ovary transposition prior to pelvic radiation therapy
Presenter: Cuong Nguyen
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
301P - Correlation between cervical cancer recurrence after radiation therapy and vaginal microbiome
Presenter: Xiaoxian Xu
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
302P - Expression of ERCC4 gene and its correlation with clinical and pathological parameters in cervical cancer
Presenter: Himanshu Mishra
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
303P - Prognostic value of body composition and systemic inflammatory markers in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer following chemoradiotherapy
Presenter: Hui Guo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
305P - A real-world multicenter cohort study of lenvatinib (LEN) plus pembrolizumab (PEM) in Japanese patients with endometrial cancer: Interim analysis of GOGO-EM4 study
Presenter: Yoshikazu Nagase
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
306P - Adjuvant treatment and impact on relapse in stage IA uterine papillary serous and clear cell carcinomas: A single center retrospective study
Presenter: Sachin Khurana
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
307P - Hormonal therapy vs combination chemotherapy in metastatic leiomyosarcomas: A systematic review
Presenter: Patricia Angel
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract