Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Mini oral session: Genitourinary tumours

263MO - Enzalutamide versus abiraterone plus prednisolone for Japanese non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients: Sub-analysis from ENABLE for PCa, a multicenter, randomized controlled trial

Date

01 Dec 2023

Session

Mini oral session: Genitourinary tumours

Topics

Tumour Site

Prostate Cancer

Presenters

Kouji Izumi

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2023) 34 (suppl_4): S1572-S1583. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1382

Authors

K. Izumi1, A. Mizokami2, S. Takahara3

Author affiliations

  • 1 Integrative Cancer Therapy And Urology, Kanazawa University Hospital, 920-8641 - Kanazawa/JP
  • 2 Integrative Cancer Therapy And Urology, Kanazawa University, 920-8641 - Kanazawa/JP
  • 3 Innovative Clinical Research Center, Kanazawa University, 920-8641 - Kanazawa/JP

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 263MO

Background

Enzalutamide (ENZ) and abiraterone plus prednisolone (ABI) demonstrated survival improvement for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). However, which agent is better for non-metastatic CRPC patients remains quite unclear.

Methods

To evaluate which agent is better for CRPC patients as a first-line treatment, an investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized controlled trial (ENABLE study for PCa) including both metastatic and non-metastatic CRPC was conducted in Japan. We additionally analyzed such as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate (≥50% decline from baseline), overall survival, and safety assessment in non-metastatic CRPC patients.

Results

In 92 patients in each arm treated and analyzed, the number of non-metastatic patients in the ENZ and the ABI arm was 15 and 26, respectively. There was no significant difference in PSA response rate between the ENZ and the ABI arms (80% and 64%, respectively; P = 0.30). There was no significant difference in overall survival between arms (median, not reached and 33.7 months in the ENZ and the ABI arm, respectively; hazard ratio, 1.47; 95% CI, 0.47–4.62; P = 0.53). Furthermore, no significant differences were observed in radiographic progression-free survival and cancer-specific survival between arms (P = 0.61 and P = 0.64, respectively). The number of grade ≥3 of adverse events in the ENZ and the ABI arm were only 4 and 6, respectively.

Conclusions

ABI showed a similar efficacy to ENZ with a similar safety profile in non-metastatic CRPC patients.

Clinical trial identification

UMIN000015529;1 November 2014.

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Japanese Foundation for Multidisciplinary Treatment of Cancer.

Disclosure

K. Izumi: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Astellas Pharma; Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Invited Speaker: Janssen Pharmaceutical. A. Mizokami: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Astellas Pharma, Janssen Pharmaceutical. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.