Abstract 239P
Background
With the induction of molecular targeted therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors, treatment strategies for systemic treatment of metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mCCRCC) have been changed with improved survival. However, for those patients diagnosed as metastatic non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mNCRCC), systemic therapy designed and approved for mCCRCC have been used because no validated systemic therapy exists. This retrospective study aimed to identify prognostic factors for patients with mNCRCC treated with systemic therapy.
Methods
A total of 270 patients were reviewed. Among them, 41 patients who pathologically diagnosed as mNCRCC and received systemic therapy were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical and pathological data were retrieved and analyzed retrospectively. The progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between mNCRCC and mCCRCC patients were compared. The OS for patients with mNCRCC was further investigated with univariate and multivariate Cox’s proportional hazards regression models.
Results
After a median follow-up of 31.3 months after first-line treatment initiation, the median PFS was 3.3 and 20.8 months for mNCRCC and mCCRCC, respectively (p<0.0001). The median OS was 19.6 and 54.4 months for mNCRCC and mCCRCC, respectively (p<0.0001). For patients with mNCRCC, univariate Cox proportional hazards model analyses revealed that the duration of first-line treatment (p<0.0001), the time to first-line treatment within 1 year (p=0.0201), high corrected serum calcium (p=0.0006), high neutrophil count (p=0.0003), and the baseline CRP level (p=0.0034) were significantly correlated with shorter OS, respectively. Furthermore, a multivariate analysis revealed the duration of first-line treatment (Hazard ratio (HR): 0.89, 95% CI: 0.81-0.97, p=0.007), the high corrected serum calcium (HR: 4.04, 95% CI: 1.58-10.37, p=0.004), and the baseline CRP level (HR: 1.15, 95% CI: 1.05-1.25, p=0.002) were independent predictors for OS in mNCRCC patients.
Conclusions
Patients with mNCCC resulted in shorter PFS and OS. Elevated baseline C-reactive protein, a prognostic factor for mCCRCC, was also correlated with shorter OS in mNCRCC.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
602P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (Enco) + binimetinib (Bini) vs vemurafenib (Vemu) or Enco in patients (Pts) with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Andrew Haydon
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
603P - An individualised postoperative radiological surveillance schedule for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients (HK-GBM Registry)
Presenter: Jason Chak Yan Li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
604P - Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Outcomes from COSMIC-311 by BRAF status
Presenter: Marcia Brose
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
606P - BRAF and NRAS mutations are associated with poor prognosis in Asians with acral-lentiginous and nodular cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
607P - Single institutional outcomes of radiotherapy and systemic therapy for melanoma brain metastases in Japan
Presenter: Naoya Yamazaki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
608P - The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in mucosal melanomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Andrea Teo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
609P - The association between thyroid function abnormalities and vitiligo induced by pembrolizumab regarding prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma
Presenter: Moez Mobarek
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
610P - Analyzing the clinical benefit of the evidence presented at these congresses and utilizing a standardized scale to quantify it will significantly enhance our understanding of the studies showcased, allowing for more objective evaluation and interpretation
Presenter: Charles Jeffrey Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
611P - ESMO-magnitude of clinical benefit scale (MCBS) scores for phase III trials of adjuvant and curative therapies at the 2022 ASCO annual meeting (ASCO22)
Presenter: Thi Thao Vi Luong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
612P - Is the juice worth the squeeze? Overall survival gain per unit treatment time as a metric of clinical benefit of systemic treatment in incurable cancers
Presenter: Vodathi Bamunuarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract