Abstract 443P
Background
The low survival rate of cancer patients, especially patients who got metastases, necessitates an approach in providing additional therapy that is safe, capable of delaying disease progression, and prolonging patient survival. Vitamin D is an adjunctive therapy that is easy to obtain and shows anti-neoplastic activity against cancer so that it can reduce mortality. This study aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis regarding the efficacy of vitamin D supplementation in overall survival (OS) of cancer patients.
Methods
A systematic search of various databases up to end of 2022 was conducted to identify Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) involving the efficacy of vitamin D supplementation in OS of cancer patients. By using a random effect model, pooled hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to determine the values of OS. In formulating the study problem, we determine the study questions based on the study background, which consists of the populations (P), interventions (I), comparisons (C), and outcomes (O). The populations were cancer patients. The intervention was administration of vitamin D supplementation. The comparison was no administration of vitamin D supplementation. The outcome was OS. The RCTs having cancer patients over 18 years of age with available and sufficient information about OS were the inclusion criteria of this study. Study that has participants taking vitamin D supplementation regularly, and ongoing study with results not presented or published at the time of the literature search were the exclusion criteria of this study.
Results
Of the six RCTs, analysis was performed on 1,916 cancer patients in this study. In terms of survival, statistically, there was no difference in OS [HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.74 – 1.28, p = 0.85] between vitamin D supplementation and no supplementation in cancer patients.
Conclusions
Although vitamin D supplementation does not improve OS in cancer patients, is could be considered because it still shows benefits for cancer patients.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Sam Ratulangi University / Prof. dr. R. D. Kandou General Hospital, Manado, Indonesia.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
602P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (Enco) + binimetinib (Bini) vs vemurafenib (Vemu) or Enco in patients (Pts) with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Andrew Haydon
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
603P - An individualised postoperative radiological surveillance schedule for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients (HK-GBM Registry)
Presenter: Jason Chak Yan Li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
604P - Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Outcomes from COSMIC-311 by BRAF status
Presenter: Marcia Brose
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
606P - BRAF and NRAS mutations are associated with poor prognosis in Asians with acral-lentiginous and nodular cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
607P - Single institutional outcomes of radiotherapy and systemic therapy for melanoma brain metastases in Japan
Presenter: Naoya Yamazaki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
608P - The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in mucosal melanomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Andrea Teo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
609P - The association between thyroid function abnormalities and vitiligo induced by pembrolizumab regarding prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma
Presenter: Moez Mobarek
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
610P - Analyzing the clinical benefit of the evidence presented at these congresses and utilizing a standardized scale to quantify it will significantly enhance our understanding of the studies showcased, allowing for more objective evaluation and interpretation
Presenter: Charles Jeffrey Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
611P - ESMO-magnitude of clinical benefit scale (MCBS) scores for phase III trials of adjuvant and curative therapies at the 2022 ASCO annual meeting (ASCO22)
Presenter: Thi Thao Vi Luong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
612P - Is the juice worth the squeeze? Overall survival gain per unit treatment time as a metric of clinical benefit of systemic treatment in incurable cancers
Presenter: Vodathi Bamunuarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract