Abstract 527P
Background
Leptomeningeal metastases (LM) of lung cancer represent a severe neurological complication with a poor prognosis and limited effective treatments. Although intraventricular chemotherapy (IVC) is the preferred management for LM, there is currently insufficient data to support its effectiveness.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective study that analyzed data from consecutive patients with LM from lung adenocarcinoma who underwent Ommaya reservoir insertion at the Nanjing Chest Hospital between 2020 and 2022. The diagnosis of LM was based on either cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytology or concordant clinical and neuroimaging findings. The chemotherapy regimen consisted of pemetrexed (30mg or 50mg) and dexamethasone (5mg) administered twice a week for up to 2 weeks during the induction phase, followed by a maintenance phase once a month until progression or maximal doses were reached.
Results
We retrospectively analyzed 56 patients (median age, 56 years) with driver gene mutations, including 46 patients with EGFR mutations, 2 patients with other gene mutations, and 8 patients with non-driver genes. Of the patients, 48.3% had an ECOG PS of 4, 35.7% had an ECOG PS of 3, and 16% had an ECOG PS of 2. Additionally, 41 patients (73.2%) received a 30mg dose of pemetrexed, and 15 patients (26.8%) received a 50mg dose. In all patients, 31 had a response, 19 had stable disease (SD), and 6 had disease progression (PD), resulting in an overall response rate (ORR) of 55.4% and a disease control rate (DCR) of 89.3%. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 6.8 months, and the median overall survival (mOS) was not reached. Subgroup analysis showed that the mPFS for the pemetrexed 50mg and 30mg groups was 12 months and 6.8 months, respectively (p=0.006), and the mPFS was 9.6 months versus 4 months in the ECOG PS of 2-3 and 4 arms(Fig1B), respectively (p=0.001). The overall adverse event (AE) rate was 65%, with all adverse effects, including nausea, vomiting, seizures, and myelosuppression, being mild and transient.
Conclusions
In this real-world study, IVC with pemetrexed demonstrated excellent and encouraging results in patients with lung adenocarcinoma and LM, at an acceptable cost of toxicity.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
602P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (Enco) + binimetinib (Bini) vs vemurafenib (Vemu) or Enco in patients (Pts) with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Andrew Haydon
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
603P - An individualised postoperative radiological surveillance schedule for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients (HK-GBM Registry)
Presenter: Jason Chak Yan Li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
604P - Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Outcomes from COSMIC-311 by BRAF status
Presenter: Marcia Brose
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
606P - BRAF and NRAS mutations are associated with poor prognosis in Asians with acral-lentiginous and nodular cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
607P - Single institutional outcomes of radiotherapy and systemic therapy for melanoma brain metastases in Japan
Presenter: Naoya Yamazaki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
608P - The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in mucosal melanomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Andrea Teo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
609P - The association between thyroid function abnormalities and vitiligo induced by pembrolizumab regarding prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma
Presenter: Moez Mobarek
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
610P - Analyzing the clinical benefit of the evidence presented at these congresses and utilizing a standardized scale to quantify it will significantly enhance our understanding of the studies showcased, allowing for more objective evaluation and interpretation
Presenter: Charles Jeffrey Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
611P - ESMO-magnitude of clinical benefit scale (MCBS) scores for phase III trials of adjuvant and curative therapies at the 2022 ASCO annual meeting (ASCO22)
Presenter: Thi Thao Vi Luong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
612P - Is the juice worth the squeeze? Overall survival gain per unit treatment time as a metric of clinical benefit of systemic treatment in incurable cancers
Presenter: Vodathi Bamunuarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract