Abstract 141P
Background
Patients with unresectable upper GI cancers have limited therapies and a dismal prognosis. While granting access to additional treatments, enrollment in phase I trials offers unclear benefits in this population.
Methods
Individual patient data of subjects with advanced upper GI cancers receiving ≥1 dose of the study drug within phase I trials at SCRI UK between 2011-2023 were collected. Objective response rate (ORR: CR+PR), clinical benefit rate (CBR: % with any tumor shrinkage), and disease control rate (DCR: CR+PR+SD) were assessed by RECIST v1.1, and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from trial start. Outcomes were reported using descriptive statistics and uni- and multivariate analyses. Subjects participating in more than one trial (n=20) were assessed separately in each study.
Results
Of 1796 patients screened, 104 patients with upper GI cancers (65% esophageal/junctional; 35% gastric) from 35 phase I trials were included. Most were male (75%), had adenocarcinoma (91%), and stage IV at diagnosis (73%). At trial entry, median age was 61 (range 20-86), median number of prior lines 2 (range 1-4), and median number of metastatic sites 2 (range 1-5). Seventy-four (60%), 37 (30%), and 13 (10%) received immunotherapy (IO), small molecules, or antibody-drug conjugates, respectively; 27 (22%) received a molecularly matched therapy. Median follow-up was 14.8 months (95% CI, 10.39-68.15). ORR was 17% (95% CI, 0.10-0.26), CBR 43% (95% CI, 0.33-0.53), and DCR 87% (95% CI, 0.79-0.93) across all trials. Efficacy was comparable by number of prior lines, trial drugs, or allocation to matched therapy. In response-evaluable patients across all trials (n=100), median OS and PFS were 12.3 (95% CI, 7.77-16.88) and 2.9 months (95% CI, 2.45-3.40), respectively, and were significantly longer for responders versus non-responders (both p<0.001). Depth of response, low metastatic burden (≤2 sites), and IO combos remained significant predictors of improved survival in multivariate analysis.
Conclusions
Participation in phase I trials offers substantial benefits in refractory upper GI cancers regardless of biomarker selection with compelling results in late-line settings and potential early access to newly approved therapies.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
281P - 10-year treatment outcome of prostate cancer patients with 3D conformal radiation: Experience of a single cancer institution in Iran
Presenter: Reyhane Bayani
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
282P - Predictors of outcomes in patients with clinically lymph node-positive prostate cancer after definitive radiotherapy
Presenter: Jae-Sung Kim
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
283P - Radiotherapy utilization rate and treatment patern of protate cancer at Cipto Mangunkusumo Central General Hospital (RSCM): What we learn from pre-pandemic era
Presenter: Riyan Apriantoni
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
284TiP - CYCLONE 3: A phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of abemaciclib in combination with abiraterone plus prednisone in men with high-risk metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer
Presenter: Nobuaki Matsubara
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
292P - Comparative characteristics of early cervical cancer diagnosis methods for Tashkent women
Presenter: Gulnoza Goyibova
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
293P - Carboplatin in locally advanced cervical cancer treated with chemoradiation: An alternative to cisplatin
Presenter: Natalia Isabel Valdiviezo Lama
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
294P - Concurrent chemoradiation with cisplatin every 3 weeks in locally advanced cervical cancer: A single arm phase II clinical trial
Presenter: Long Nguyen
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
295P - A prospective study of dose escalated simultaneous integrated boost in node-positive cervical cancer
Presenter: Ritusha Mishra
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
296P - Safety, efficacy, and immunogenicity of therapeutic vaccines for patients with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN 2/3) associated with human papillomavirus: A systematic review
Presenter: Caroline Amélia Gonçalves
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
297P - The utilization rate of radiotherapy and chemotherapy for cervical cancer in Indonesia: Optimal versus actual, how far the gap?
Presenter: Charity Kotambunan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract