Abstract 21P
Background
Clinical trial registries record the proposed and actual completion date of studies. Study duration affects budget, personnel, governance and ethics. To our knowledge, no data exists comparing estimated time to study completion with actual completion date. Using breast cancer trials as an exemplar, we analyzed differences between estimated and actual duration of clinical trials.
Methods
A sophisticated artificial intelligence (AI) tool, Risklick AI®1-3 analysed clinical trial registry fields for proposed trial completion (entered at time of study registration) compared to date entered for study completion. This technology collects and unifies trial data from all 18 public registries, including clinicaltrials.gov and WHO. The comprehensive search performed on 15.3.23 for period 2000 – 2023 used 101 keywords to cover breast cancer subtypes in completed trials. Trials were analyzed according to factors postulated to impact duration: disease extent, histological subtype, phase, number of eligibility criteria, sample size, country and sponsor. Delay was defined as the additional time required to complete the trial compared to the estimated study completion date, with a tolerance of 30 days.
Results
582 trials, involving 104’384 patients, recorded both planned and actual completion dates. Overall, 21.6% were finished early, 7.9% on time, and 70.4% had delay, of mean 31.7 +/- 25.6 months [standard deviation], ranging 1 - 155 months. The mean delay was similar for trials analysed by disease extent, breast cancer subtype, phase, number of eligibility criteria, sample size, country, or sponsor type.
Conclusions
This large real-world dataset revealed an average delay in completion of 2.5-year for 70% of breast cancer trials, independent of multiple factors commonly thought to affect trial duration. This data should be considered when planning, budgeting and setting participant and community expectations for trials. Tools to accurately predict trial duration and efforts to reduce delays are needed.
References: 1. www.risklick.ch 2. Front Digit Health. 2021;3 3. Pharmacology. 2021;106(5-6):244-253.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
University of Bern.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
P. Khlebnikov, F. Meer, Q. Haas: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Risklick AG. P. Amini: Financial Interests, Personal, Ownership Interest: Risklick AG. E. Segelov: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker, Limbic are a medical educational company running various seminars which I have participated in as an invited speaker/Chair: Limbic; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker, webinar on colorectal cancer 28/02/21: Servier; Financial Interests, Institutional, Local PI, As head of the Oncology Cancer clinical trials at Monash Health (until 15 Aug 2022) where there were >200 trials active, there were the usual commercial arrangements to run the trials with the institution. There was no personal financial benefit from any: > 15 different companies. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
27P - The biological characteristics of HER2-low in TNBC using mRNA profiling and molecular subtypes
Presenter: Asako Tsuruga
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
28P - One-week ultra-hypofractionated partial breast RT in early breast cancer: 3DCRT vs IMRT
Presenter: Nurilla Zaynutdinov
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
30P - Stereotactic body radiotherapy using cyberknife versus interstitial brachytherapy in accelerated partial breast irradiation on left-sided breast: A comparison of preliminary clinical result and dosimetric characteristics
Presenter: Ting-Na Wei
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
31P - Prognostic implication of breast edema on preoperative breast MRI in breast cancer
Presenter: Ki-tae Hwang
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
32P - Efficacy of olanzapine in the prophylaxis of delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in breast cancer patients receiving dose-dense AC with a steroid-sparing regimen: A single-center pilot study
Presenter: Manami Tada
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
34P - Social support as the mediator of the association between unmet needs and happiness among women with early breast cancer
Presenter: Nithiya Sinarajoo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
35P - Prospective study assessing the efficacy and safety of a scalp cooling device for the prevention of alopecia in breast cancer patients undergoing (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy
Presenter: Winnie Yeo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
37P - To excise or not to excise: Preventive management of early breast cancer in atypical ductal hyperplasia patients
Presenter: Clarisse Hing
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
38P - Exploring prognostic factors in patients achieving PCR after neoadjuvant therapy for triple-negative breast cancer: A retrospective study based on SEER data
Presenter: Lv Wenjie
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
39P - Prognostic significance of hypoxic microenvironment biomarkers in invasive ductal breast cancer
Presenter: Sungmin Kang
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract