Abstract 613P
Background
Physicians have frequent interactions with the pharmaceutical industry (pharma), however, there is concern for possible corporate influence on physicians’ prescribing behaviours. We sought to understand perceptions and interactions between pharma and medical oncologists (MO), in comparison with infectious diseases (ID) physicians.
Methods
We conducted an anonymous online cross-sectional survey of Australian MO and ID physicians comparing self-reported interactions and attitudes with pharma. An additional survey was undertaken at Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.
Results
A total of 204 Australian and Singaporean physicians were surveyed including 102 oncologists and 102 ID physicians. Demographics including age, gender and years of practice between the two Australian specialties were similar, with an exception that most ID physicians had mainly public work (95% vs. 78% for oncologists, p<0.001). Oncologists had more frequent contact with pharma, the majority (69%) negotiating compassionate access for patients on a monthly/annual basis, compared with ID physicians who had never done so (45%), p<0.001. More ID physicians had never attended a sponsored meeting (15% ID vs. 27% MO respectively, p=0.01) or received travel/accommodation grants from pharma (42% ID vs. 85% MO respectively, p<0.001). However, most physicians (92%) had never received gifts from pharma, with no difference between groups (p=0.17). Most Australian oncologists believed that interacting with pharma was overall beneficial for patient care (78%) compared to ID physicians (34%, p<0.001). This statement was shared by 71% of Singaporean oncologists. Similar rates of Australian oncologists and ID physicians (83% vs. 88%, respectively) felt comfortable for patients to know the details of their interactions with pharma, however, only 57% of Singaporean oncologists agreed with this statement. Most Australian respondents (77%) agreed that there was strong public skepticism of these interactions (p=0.35).
Conclusions
Medical oncologists had more interactions with pharma than ID physicians and were more likely to believe that this was overall beneficial to patient care despite the negative public perception associated with this.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
P.L. Chia: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Merck, Roche, Pfizer, Amgen; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Funding: Merck, Roche, Pfizer, Amgen. T. John: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker, Speaker tour Vietnam: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker, CTIO: Merck Sharp Dohme; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: BMS, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Specialised Therapeutics; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Roche, Novartis, Pfizer, Amgen, Takeda, PharmaMar; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Speaker/Chair: ACE Oncology. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
382P - Oral health disparities in privileged and underprivileged tribes of south India: A study of the prevalence of precancerous oral lesions
Presenter: Shanavas Palliyal
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
383P - Pre-treatment body mass index and neutrophil lymphocyte ratio predict 3-years progression free survival in locally advanced stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma
Presenter: Ni Putu Pusvita Dewi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
384P - Sequential multi-modality strategies for locally advanced betel-nuts related hypopharyngeal cancer in Taiwan
Presenter: Wei-Chen Lu
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
385P - The prognostic factors of induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with HPV associated with oropharyngeal cancer
Presenter: Hyun Jin Bang
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
386P - FOLR1 stabilized beta-catenin promotes laryngeal carcinoma progression through EGFR signal
Presenter: Huawei Tuo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
387P - A comprehensive analysis of the oral health status, tobacco use, and cancer prevalence among the tribal communities in India
Presenter: Delfin Lovelina Francis
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
388P - Clinicopathological correlation of P53 expression in oral cancers
Presenter: Venkata Madhavi Bellala
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
389P - Lack of cross-resistance to erlotinib in human head and neck cancer cells with acquired resistance to cetuximab
Presenter: James A. Bonner
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
390P - Epidemiological aspects of the development of oral cancer in the Republic of Uzbekistan
Presenter: Akhrorbek Yusupbekov
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
391P - Lip cancer: Racial disparities, treatment modalities and long-term survival outcome in young and adults versus older age patients
Presenter: FathAlrahman Ibrahim
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract