Abstract 613P
Background
Physicians have frequent interactions with the pharmaceutical industry (pharma), however, there is concern for possible corporate influence on physicians’ prescribing behaviours. We sought to understand perceptions and interactions between pharma and medical oncologists (MO), in comparison with infectious diseases (ID) physicians.
Methods
We conducted an anonymous online cross-sectional survey of Australian MO and ID physicians comparing self-reported interactions and attitudes with pharma. An additional survey was undertaken at Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.
Results
A total of 204 Australian and Singaporean physicians were surveyed including 102 oncologists and 102 ID physicians. Demographics including age, gender and years of practice between the two Australian specialties were similar, with an exception that most ID physicians had mainly public work (95% vs. 78% for oncologists, p<0.001). Oncologists had more frequent contact with pharma, the majority (69%) negotiating compassionate access for patients on a monthly/annual basis, compared with ID physicians who had never done so (45%), p<0.001. More ID physicians had never attended a sponsored meeting (15% ID vs. 27% MO respectively, p=0.01) or received travel/accommodation grants from pharma (42% ID vs. 85% MO respectively, p<0.001). However, most physicians (92%) had never received gifts from pharma, with no difference between groups (p=0.17). Most Australian oncologists believed that interacting with pharma was overall beneficial for patient care (78%) compared to ID physicians (34%, p<0.001). This statement was shared by 71% of Singaporean oncologists. Similar rates of Australian oncologists and ID physicians (83% vs. 88%, respectively) felt comfortable for patients to know the details of their interactions with pharma, however, only 57% of Singaporean oncologists agreed with this statement. Most Australian respondents (77%) agreed that there was strong public skepticism of these interactions (p=0.35).
Conclusions
Medical oncologists had more interactions with pharma than ID physicians and were more likely to believe that this was overall beneficial to patient care despite the negative public perception associated with this.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
P.L. Chia: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Merck, Roche, Pfizer, Amgen; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Funding: Merck, Roche, Pfizer, Amgen. T. John: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker, Speaker tour Vietnam: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker, CTIO: Merck Sharp Dohme; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: BMS, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Specialised Therapeutics; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Roche, Novartis, Pfizer, Amgen, Takeda, PharmaMar; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Speaker/Chair: ACE Oncology. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
203P - Neoadjuvant durvalumab plus chemotherapy for resectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC)
Presenter: Jia He
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
204P - A radiomics strategy based on CT intra-tumoral and peritumoral regions for preoperative prediction of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer
Presenter: zhiyang li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
205TiP - IMPACT: Randomized, multicenter, phase III study evaluating the efficacy of immunotherapy (atezolizumab) plus anti-VEGF therapy (bevacizumab) in combination with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)
Presenter: Tatsuya Yamashita
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
206TiP - SIERRA: A phase IIIb, single-arm, multicentre study of tremelimumab plus durvalumab for first-line treatment of advanced unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
Presenter: Stephen Chan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
207TiP - A two-arm randomized open-label prospective design superiority phase III clinical trial to compare the efficacy of docetaxel-oxaliplatin-capecitabine/ 5 -fluorouracil (DOC/F) followed by docetaxel versus CAPOX/mFOLFOX-7 in advanced gastric cancers
Presenter: Prabhat Bhargava
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
212P - Mutational landscape and characteristics of ERBB2 in urothelial carcinoma
Presenter: Mingwei Li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
213P - Prognostic significance of absolute lymphocyte count in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with first-line combination immunotherapies: Results from the International metastatic renal cell carcinoma database consortium (IMDC)
Presenter: Kosuke Takemura
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
214P - Development and prospective validation of a multiplex RNA urine test for noninvasive detection and surveillance of urothelial carcinoma
Presenter: Hua Xu
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
215P - Real-world outcomes of first-line tislelizumab plus axitinib in patients with metastatic non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mnccRCC)
Presenter: Pei Dong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
216P - Preliminary efficacy and safety results from ‘ReBirth’: A phase II study of risk-based bladder-sparing therapy for MIBC
Presenter: Yijun Shen
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract