Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display

108P - Detection of HER2 overexpression in colorectal cancer: Comparison of a HANDLE classic NGS panel with standard IHC/FISH

Date

02 Dec 2023

Session

Poster Display

Presenters

Lijuan Luan

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2023) 34 (suppl_4): S1502-S1519. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1378

Authors

L. Luan, J. Huang, Y. Hou, X. Wang, L. Zhang, W. Pan, J. Liu, A. Sujie, L. Zhang, C. Xu

Author affiliations

  • Department Of Pathology, Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, 200032 - Shanghai/CN

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 108P

Background

The human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2/neu) play a predictive and prognostic role in colorectal cancer (CRC). Accurate evaluating of HER2 overexpression is required for selection and determination of eligible patients for HER2-directed therapy or primary resistance and poor response to anti-EGFR therapy. However, there is no currently established best practice for HER2 testing and interpretation in CRC. The purpose of this study was to validate and evaluate the performance of AmoyDx® HANDLE Classic NGS Panel (CP40) in assessing HER2 status by comparing it with HER2 IHC (4B5)/FISH analysis.

Methods

The CP40 is based on Halo-shape ANnealing and Defer-Ligation Enrichment (HANDLE) system technology, which allows high sensitivity in 40 key solid tumour genes qualitative detection and microsatellite instability (MSI) status assessment utilizing DNA and RNA. Performance of the CP40 was compared against the HER2 IHC/FISH assay according to the HERACLES scoring criteria using 805 CRC samples. Only samples with a ratio ERBB2:CEN17 ≥ 2 or staining equivocal (2+) or positive (3+) in at least 50% of cells were determined as HER2 IHC/FISH positive.

Results

CP40 and IHC/FISH assays were highly concordant in their assessment of HER2 status in CRCs (99.50%, 801/805, kappa = 0.892). Three conflicting results were negative in CP40 but were scored 2+ in 50-70% of the cells and identified as positive by IHC/FISH. One CRC scored as 3+ in 40% cells was determined to be negative by both CP40 and IHC/FISH. And all MSI CRCs were evaluated as HER2 negative by both CP40 and IHC. Table: 108P

Comparison of HER2 status determined from CP40 and IHC/FISH assays

ERBB2 NGS-based CNV testing
True False Total
HER2 IHC/FISH assay Positive 17 3 20
Negative 1 784 785
Total 18 787 805
Kappa= 0.892
Overall coincidence rate = 99.50%

Conclusions

CRC-specific HER2 testing protocols and HER2 scoring criteria still needs to be optimised in a more refined and defined manner. HANDLE-based CP40, which combines DNA and RNA in NGS testing, is a potent tool for sensitive and reliable detection of HER2 status in clinical diagnostics.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.