Abstract 169P
Background
The TALENTop study (NCT04649489) is aiming to clarify whether hepatic resection may provide additional benefit in HCC patients with macrovascular invasion (MVI) who responded to conversion therapy with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (atezo/bev). This study is onging and the primary analysis is expected at a later time; instead, this analyse is to demonstrate the conversion results of atezo/bev. To describe the response and safety outcomes of the conversion therapy and prognostic factors associated with being suitable for R0 hepatic resection.
Methods
HCC patients with MVI and without extrahepatic metastasis are eligible for this study. After received 3 cycles of atezo/bev and 1 cycle of atezo (induction phase), patients assessed as PR or SD (RECIST v1.1) and considered suitable for R0 hepatic resection are 1:1 randomized to Arm A, hepatic resection followed by atezo/bev for 1 year, or Arm B, continuing atezo/bev therapy. The primary endpoint is the time to treatment failure (tumor recurrence or progression or death). Treatment efficacy in the induction phase were analysed.
Results
From Apr 2021 to Dec 2022, 201 patients were enrolled and entered induction phase and completed induction phase therapy of atezo/bev at cut-off date (Apr 2023). The patients were characterized with a median age of 55 (26-78) and 187 (93%) had HBV infection. Mean tumor diameter evaluated by IRF is 100 mm (26-231 mm). All patients had MVI at baseline and 191 (95%) had PVTT. According to RECIST v1.1 criteria, 38 patients (18.9%) achieved PR and 106 patients (52.7%) achieved SD with 3 cycles of atezo/bev and 1 cycle of atezo. ORR and DCR were 18.9% and 71.6%, respectively. Grades ≥3 TRAEs occurred in 26 patients (12.9%). Most common TRAE was fever (13.4%) and proteinuria (10.9%). Of 201 patients, 73 patients (36.3%) were evaluated as suitable for R0 resection and randomized. In univariate logistic regression, PVTT with vp1-2, AFP<400ng/mL, NLR (neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio)<2.63, tumor diameter<100mm were associated with randomization.
Conclusions
Atezo/bev showed high response rate and conversion rate in the HCC patients with MVI, suggesting a promising conversion strategy in this population.
Clinical trial identification
NCT04649489.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University.
Funding
Shanghai Roche Pharmaceuticals Ltd., China.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
602P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (Enco) + binimetinib (Bini) vs vemurafenib (Vemu) or Enco in patients (Pts) with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Andrew Haydon
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
603P - An individualised postoperative radiological surveillance schedule for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients (HK-GBM Registry)
Presenter: Jason Chak Yan Li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
604P - Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Outcomes from COSMIC-311 by BRAF status
Presenter: Marcia Brose
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
606P - BRAF and NRAS mutations are associated with poor prognosis in Asians with acral-lentiginous and nodular cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
607P - Single institutional outcomes of radiotherapy and systemic therapy for melanoma brain metastases in Japan
Presenter: Naoya Yamazaki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
608P - The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in mucosal melanomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Andrea Teo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
609P - The association between thyroid function abnormalities and vitiligo induced by pembrolizumab regarding prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma
Presenter: Moez Mobarek
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
610P - Analyzing the clinical benefit of the evidence presented at these congresses and utilizing a standardized scale to quantify it will significantly enhance our understanding of the studies showcased, allowing for more objective evaluation and interpretation
Presenter: Charles Jeffrey Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
611P - ESMO-magnitude of clinical benefit scale (MCBS) scores for phase III trials of adjuvant and curative therapies at the 2022 ASCO annual meeting (ASCO22)
Presenter: Thi Thao Vi Luong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
612P - Is the juice worth the squeeze? Overall survival gain per unit treatment time as a metric of clinical benefit of systemic treatment in incurable cancers
Presenter: Vodathi Bamunuarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract