Abstract 559P
Background
BRAF mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) can be divided into three classes. Only class I (BRAF V600E/X) mutated NSCLC has FDA approved treatment options. The other two classes due to their unique mechanisms of oncogenesis do not have approved treatment. We explored any potential molecular differences between these three classes focused primarily on tumor mutation burden (TMB) to assess if immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is a possible option for all three classes of BRAF+ NSCLC.
Methods
We queried the public AACR GENIE database (version 13.1) that included TMB as performed by the AACR GENIC database.
Results
Out of 20,713 unique NSCLC patients, 3.96% were either class I, II, or III BRAF mutations (class I: 1.6%, class II: 1.3%; class III: 1.1%). An additional 1.7% non-class I-III BRAF mutations were identified but were not analyzed for this abstract. The mean age, sex, racial composition, and distribution of the BRAF mutations in all three classes are shown in the table. The median TMB (mt/MB) were 6.5, 9.5, and 10.3 for class I, II, and III BRAF+ NSCLC respectively. 30.5 % of V600E had TMB ≥ 10; 47.7% of class II had TMB ≥ 10; and 52.5% of class III had TMB ≥ 10. For those patients with TMB ≥ 10, the median TMB was 45, 28.9, 18.4 for class I, II, and III respectively with a 7.7% with range of median TMB between 50-100 (class I), 10.4% with median TMB range 100-500 (class II), 8.1% with median TMB range of 100-500 (class III). There is no statistical significance in the mean or median TMB by pair-wise comparison of all three classes. Genomic co-alterations were being analyzed and will be updated. Table: 559P
Class I (N = 324) | Class II (N = 260) | Class III (N = 236) | |
Mean age (SD) | 67.4+/-10.5 | 69.0+/-8.9 | 67.6+/-9.6 |
Sex (%) | Female (58.6%) | Female (56.5%) | Female (49.6%) |
Race | White (70.7%)Black (8.3%)Asian (4.9%)Unknown (16%) | White (80.4%)Black (6.9%)Asian (2.3%)Unknown (10.4%) | White (77.5%)Black (10.6%)Asian (2.1%)Unknown (9.7%) |
Mutations | V600E (99.1%) V600K (0.6%) V600D (0.3%) | G469A/V/R (64.6%) K601E/N (23.5%) G464V/E (9.6%) L597Q (2.6%) | G466V/E/A (39.0%) D594N/G/A/H (29.2%) N581S/I (20.3%) G596R (8.5%) G469E (1.7%) V459L (0.85%) D287H (0.4%) S467L (0.4%) |
Conclusions
BRAF+ NSCLC patients are elderly. Class III has the highest median TMB followed by class II then class I. Based on TMB distribution, there is extensive heterogeneity within each three classes of BRAF+ NSCLC. Many BRAF+ NSCLC tumors have a high proportion having TMB ≥ 10. ICI is a potential treatment option for substantial proportion of all three classes of BRAF+ NSCLC.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
M. Nagasaka: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, Caris Life Sciences, Daiichi Sankyo, Novartis, EMD Serono, Janssen, Lilly, Pfizer, Genentech, Mirati, Regeneron, Silverback; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Takeda, Blueprint; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel: AnHeart. S.I. Ou: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Pfizer, Roche; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: JNJ/Janssen, Elevation Oncology, AnHeart Therapeutics; Financial Interests, Personal, Ownership Interest: MBrace Therapeutics, BlossomHill Therapeutics; Financial Interests, Institutional, Local PI: Pfizer, Mirati, JNJ/Janssen, Merus, Revolution Medicine, Nuvalent. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
26P - Subcutaneous trastuzumab versus intravenous trastuzumab for treatment of patients with HER2-positive breast cancer: A time, motion and cost-benefit assessment in a day care oncology unit in China
Presenter: Bei Sun
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
27P - The biological characteristics of HER2-low in TNBC using mRNA profiling and molecular subtypes
Presenter: Asako Tsuruga
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
28P - One-week ultra-hypofractionated partial breast RT in early breast cancer: 3DCRT vs IMRT
Presenter: Nurilla Zaynutdinov
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
30P - Stereotactic body radiotherapy using cyberknife versus interstitial brachytherapy in accelerated partial breast irradiation on left-sided breast: A comparison of preliminary clinical result and dosimetric characteristics
Presenter: Ting-Na Wei
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
31P - Prognostic implication of breast edema on preoperative breast MRI in breast cancer
Presenter: Ki-tae Hwang
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
32P - Efficacy of olanzapine in the prophylaxis of delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in breast cancer patients receiving dose-dense AC with a steroid-sparing regimen: A single-center pilot study
Presenter: Manami Tada
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
34P - Social support as the mediator of the association between unmet needs and happiness among women with early breast cancer
Presenter: Nithiya Sinarajoo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
35P - Prospective study assessing the efficacy and safety of a scalp cooling device for the prevention of alopecia in breast cancer patients undergoing (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy
Presenter: Winnie Yeo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
37P - To excise or not to excise: Preventive management of early breast cancer in atypical ductal hyperplasia patients
Presenter: Clarisse Hing
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
38P - Exploring prognostic factors in patients achieving PCR after neoadjuvant therapy for triple-negative breast cancer: A retrospective study based on SEER data
Presenter: Lv Wenjie
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract