Abstract 559P
Background
BRAF mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) can be divided into three classes. Only class I (BRAF V600E/X) mutated NSCLC has FDA approved treatment options. The other two classes due to their unique mechanisms of oncogenesis do not have approved treatment. We explored any potential molecular differences between these three classes focused primarily on tumor mutation burden (TMB) to assess if immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is a possible option for all three classes of BRAF+ NSCLC.
Methods
We queried the public AACR GENIE database (version 13.1) that included TMB as performed by the AACR GENIC database.
Results
Out of 20,713 unique NSCLC patients, 3.96% were either class I, II, or III BRAF mutations (class I: 1.6%, class II: 1.3%; class III: 1.1%). An additional 1.7% non-class I-III BRAF mutations were identified but were not analyzed for this abstract. The mean age, sex, racial composition, and distribution of the BRAF mutations in all three classes are shown in the table. The median TMB (mt/MB) were 6.5, 9.5, and 10.3 for class I, II, and III BRAF+ NSCLC respectively. 30.5 % of V600E had TMB ≥ 10; 47.7% of class II had TMB ≥ 10; and 52.5% of class III had TMB ≥ 10. For those patients with TMB ≥ 10, the median TMB was 45, 28.9, 18.4 for class I, II, and III respectively with a 7.7% with range of median TMB between 50-100 (class I), 10.4% with median TMB range 100-500 (class II), 8.1% with median TMB range of 100-500 (class III). There is no statistical significance in the mean or median TMB by pair-wise comparison of all three classes. Genomic co-alterations were being analyzed and will be updated. Table: 559P
Class I (N = 324) | Class II (N = 260) | Class III (N = 236) | |
Mean age (SD) | 67.4+/-10.5 | 69.0+/-8.9 | 67.6+/-9.6 |
Sex (%) | Female (58.6%) | Female (56.5%) | Female (49.6%) |
Race | White (70.7%)Black (8.3%)Asian (4.9%)Unknown (16%) | White (80.4%)Black (6.9%)Asian (2.3%)Unknown (10.4%) | White (77.5%)Black (10.6%)Asian (2.1%)Unknown (9.7%) |
Mutations | V600E (99.1%) V600K (0.6%) V600D (0.3%) | G469A/V/R (64.6%) K601E/N (23.5%) G464V/E (9.6%) L597Q (2.6%) | G466V/E/A (39.0%) D594N/G/A/H (29.2%) N581S/I (20.3%) G596R (8.5%) G469E (1.7%) V459L (0.85%) D287H (0.4%) S467L (0.4%) |
Conclusions
BRAF+ NSCLC patients are elderly. Class III has the highest median TMB followed by class II then class I. Based on TMB distribution, there is extensive heterogeneity within each three classes of BRAF+ NSCLC. Many BRAF+ NSCLC tumors have a high proportion having TMB ≥ 10. ICI is a potential treatment option for substantial proportion of all three classes of BRAF+ NSCLC.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
M. Nagasaka: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, Caris Life Sciences, Daiichi Sankyo, Novartis, EMD Serono, Janssen, Lilly, Pfizer, Genentech, Mirati, Regeneron, Silverback; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Takeda, Blueprint; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel: AnHeart. S.I. Ou: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Pfizer, Roche; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: JNJ/Janssen, Elevation Oncology, AnHeart Therapeutics; Financial Interests, Personal, Ownership Interest: MBrace Therapeutics, BlossomHill Therapeutics; Financial Interests, Institutional, Local PI: Pfizer, Mirati, JNJ/Janssen, Merus, Revolution Medicine, Nuvalent. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
111P - Comparison of the efficacy and safety of fruquintinib and fruquintinib combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of metastatic microsatellite stable colorectal cancer: A real-world study
Presenter: Zhiqiang Wang
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
112P - Optimal classification and treatment strategy based on technical and oncological futures in recurrence of colorectal liver metastases
Presenter: Kosuke Kobayashi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
113P - Phase I/II study of capecitabine(C)/oxaliplatin(O)/irinotecan(I) combined with bevacizumab(B) in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)
Presenter: Kai Ou
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
114P - The prognostic role of LAG-3 expression in metastatic colorectal cancer
Presenter: Yi-Hsuan Huang
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
115P - Sidedness and survival of chemo-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer treated with lonsurf or regorafenib: A nationwide population-based study in Taiwan
Presenter: Meng-Che Hsieh
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
116P - Burden and trends of colorectal cancer in high income Asia Pacific countries from 1990-2019 and its projections of deaths to 2040: A comparative analysis
Presenter: Monika Chhayani
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
117P - Australasian real-world treatment selection and clinical outcomes for patients with left side (LS), RAS wildtype (RASwt) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)
Presenter: Vanessa Wong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
119P - Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in the mode of hypofractionation in locally advanced rectal cancer: Is it time to change standards of care?
Presenter: Abror Abdujapparov
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
120P - Improved clinical outcomes with cetuximab maintenance therapy in left-sided RAS/BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: A real-world study of Hunan cancer hospital
Presenter: Xiaolin Yang
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
121P - Single-cell sequencing reveals the role of Treg cells with high expression of BIRC3 in regulating the progression of colorectal cancer
Presenter: Yuqiu Xu
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract