Abstract 559P
Background
BRAF mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) can be divided into three classes. Only class I (BRAF V600E/X) mutated NSCLC has FDA approved treatment options. The other two classes due to their unique mechanisms of oncogenesis do not have approved treatment. We explored any potential molecular differences between these three classes focused primarily on tumor mutation burden (TMB) to assess if immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is a possible option for all three classes of BRAF+ NSCLC.
Methods
We queried the public AACR GENIE database (version 13.1) that included TMB as performed by the AACR GENIC database.
Results
Out of 20,713 unique NSCLC patients, 3.96% were either class I, II, or III BRAF mutations (class I: 1.6%, class II: 1.3%; class III: 1.1%). An additional 1.7% non-class I-III BRAF mutations were identified but were not analyzed for this abstract. The mean age, sex, racial composition, and distribution of the BRAF mutations in all three classes are shown in the table. The median TMB (mt/MB) were 6.5, 9.5, and 10.3 for class I, II, and III BRAF+ NSCLC respectively. 30.5 % of V600E had TMB ≥ 10; 47.7% of class II had TMB ≥ 10; and 52.5% of class III had TMB ≥ 10. For those patients with TMB ≥ 10, the median TMB was 45, 28.9, 18.4 for class I, II, and III respectively with a 7.7% with range of median TMB between 50-100 (class I), 10.4% with median TMB range 100-500 (class II), 8.1% with median TMB range of 100-500 (class III). There is no statistical significance in the mean or median TMB by pair-wise comparison of all three classes. Genomic co-alterations were being analyzed and will be updated. Table: 559P
Class I (N = 324) | Class II (N = 260) | Class III (N = 236) | |
Mean age (SD) | 67.4+/-10.5 | 69.0+/-8.9 | 67.6+/-9.6 |
Sex (%) | Female (58.6%) | Female (56.5%) | Female (49.6%) |
Race | White (70.7%)Black (8.3%)Asian (4.9%)Unknown (16%) | White (80.4%)Black (6.9%)Asian (2.3%)Unknown (10.4%) | White (77.5%)Black (10.6%)Asian (2.1%)Unknown (9.7%) |
Mutations | V600E (99.1%) V600K (0.6%) V600D (0.3%) | G469A/V/R (64.6%) K601E/N (23.5%) G464V/E (9.6%) L597Q (2.6%) | G466V/E/A (39.0%) D594N/G/A/H (29.2%) N581S/I (20.3%) G596R (8.5%) G469E (1.7%) V459L (0.85%) D287H (0.4%) S467L (0.4%) |
Conclusions
BRAF+ NSCLC patients are elderly. Class III has the highest median TMB followed by class II then class I. Based on TMB distribution, there is extensive heterogeneity within each three classes of BRAF+ NSCLC. Many BRAF+ NSCLC tumors have a high proportion having TMB ≥ 10. ICI is a potential treatment option for substantial proportion of all three classes of BRAF+ NSCLC.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
M. Nagasaka: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, Caris Life Sciences, Daiichi Sankyo, Novartis, EMD Serono, Janssen, Lilly, Pfizer, Genentech, Mirati, Regeneron, Silverback; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Takeda, Blueprint; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel: AnHeart. S.I. Ou: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Pfizer, Roche; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: JNJ/Janssen, Elevation Oncology, AnHeart Therapeutics; Financial Interests, Personal, Ownership Interest: MBrace Therapeutics, BlossomHill Therapeutics; Financial Interests, Institutional, Local PI: Pfizer, Mirati, JNJ/Janssen, Merus, Revolution Medicine, Nuvalent. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
280P - Radium-223 for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with symptomatic bone metastases progressing after first-line abiraterone or enzalutamide: One institutional experience
Presenter: Keng Man Chiang
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
281P - 10-year treatment outcome of prostate cancer patients with 3D conformal radiation: Experience of a single cancer institution in Iran
Presenter: Reyhane Bayani
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
282P - Predictors of outcomes in patients with clinically lymph node-positive prostate cancer after definitive radiotherapy
Presenter: Jae-Sung Kim
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
283P - Radiotherapy utilization rate and treatment patern of protate cancer at Cipto Mangunkusumo Central General Hospital (RSCM): What we learn from pre-pandemic era
Presenter: Riyan Apriantoni
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
284TiP - CYCLONE 3: A phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of abemaciclib in combination with abiraterone plus prednisone in men with high-risk metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer
Presenter: Nobuaki Matsubara
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
292P - Comparative characteristics of early cervical cancer diagnosis methods for Tashkent women
Presenter: Gulnoza Goyibova
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
293P - Carboplatin in locally advanced cervical cancer treated with chemoradiation: An alternative to cisplatin
Presenter: Natalia Isabel Valdiviezo Lama
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
294P - Concurrent chemoradiation with cisplatin every 3 weeks in locally advanced cervical cancer: A single arm phase II clinical trial
Presenter: Long Nguyen
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
295P - A prospective study of dose escalated simultaneous integrated boost in node-positive cervical cancer
Presenter: Ritusha Mishra
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
296P - Safety, efficacy, and immunogenicity of therapeutic vaccines for patients with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN 2/3) associated with human papillomavirus: A systematic review
Presenter: Caroline Amélia Gonçalves
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract