Abstract 202P
Background
Interventional therapy is the main treatment for intermediate and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and liver injury is one of the common adverse effects after interventional therapy. This study aimed to compare the liver injury after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) combined with ICIs and TKIs for intermediate and advanced HCC.
Methods
We retrospectively enrolled patients with intermediate and advanced HCC who received TACE/HAIC combined with ICIs and TKIs from January 2019 to November 2021, in Nanfang Hospital. The liver function indexs within 1 week before treatment and on the first day after intervention were recorded. The degree of postoperative liver injury was assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0 (CTCAE 5.0).
Results
82 patients were treated with HAIC combined with ICIs and TKIs and another 77 patients received TACE combined with ICIs and TKIs. There were no significant differences in gender, age, cirrhosis, Child-Pugh grade, ALBI grade and combined ICIs and TKIs regimen at baseline between the two groups. The patients had more advanced tumor stage, heavier tumor load, and poorer liver reserve function in the HAIC group. Patients who underwent HAIC had larger proportion of BCLC stage C HCC(81.7% vs 63.6%,p=0.01),greater percentage of tumor with a maximum diameter greater than or equal to 10 centimeters(64.6% vs 32.5%,p<0.001)than patients in the TACE group. The frequencies of elevated ALT (28.0% vs 63.6%; P<0.001), elevated AST (54.9% vs 85.7%; p<0.001), and hyperbilirubinemia (40.2% vs 55.8%,p=0.049) were significantly lower in the HAIC group than in the TACE group. There were more patients having ALBI score of grade III after therapy in the TACE group than in the HAIC group(16.9% vs 6.1%,p=0.032). The effectiveness of HAIC with ICIs and TKIs were comparable to TACE with ICIs and TKIs.
Conclusions
The incidence of liver injury events was higher in the TACE group than in the HAIC group.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
602P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (Enco) + binimetinib (Bini) vs vemurafenib (Vemu) or Enco in patients (Pts) with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Andrew Haydon
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
603P - An individualised postoperative radiological surveillance schedule for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients (HK-GBM Registry)
Presenter: Jason Chak Yan Li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
604P - Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Outcomes from COSMIC-311 by BRAF status
Presenter: Marcia Brose
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
606P - BRAF and NRAS mutations are associated with poor prognosis in Asians with acral-lentiginous and nodular cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
607P - Single institutional outcomes of radiotherapy and systemic therapy for melanoma brain metastases in Japan
Presenter: Naoya Yamazaki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
608P - The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in mucosal melanomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Andrea Teo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
609P - The association between thyroid function abnormalities and vitiligo induced by pembrolizumab regarding prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma
Presenter: Moez Mobarek
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
610P - Analyzing the clinical benefit of the evidence presented at these congresses and utilizing a standardized scale to quantify it will significantly enhance our understanding of the studies showcased, allowing for more objective evaluation and interpretation
Presenter: Charles Jeffrey Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
611P - ESMO-magnitude of clinical benefit scale (MCBS) scores for phase III trials of adjuvant and curative therapies at the 2022 ASCO annual meeting (ASCO22)
Presenter: Thi Thao Vi Luong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
612P - Is the juice worth the squeeze? Overall survival gain per unit treatment time as a metric of clinical benefit of systemic treatment in incurable cancers
Presenter: Vodathi Bamunuarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract