Abstract 397P
Background
Dexamethasone is the standard premedication for preventing nausea, vomiting and hypersensitivity reactions but the incidence of oxaliplatin hypersensitivity is varied. This study aimed to compare the incidence of any grade of oxaliplatin hypersensitivity between using the Y-site co-infusion of oxaliplatin and dexamethasone or standard premedication with intravenous dexamethasone to prevent hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) and also to compare the degree of venous pain, objective response rate (ORR), progression free survival (PFS) and common adverse events.
Methods
Patients with stage III and IV of colorectal cancer who received capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPEOX) regimen at least 3 cycles from March 2022 to March 2023 were enrolled. At the 4th cycle, all enrolled patients were randomly assigned to receive either Y-site co-infusion of oxaliplatin and dexamethasone (arm A) or standard premedication with intravenous dexamethasone followed by Y-site co-infusion of oxaliplatin and placebo (arm B). The incidence of HSRs and the degree of venous pain between arm A and arm B were analyzed by using Chi-square and log-rank test was used for evaluate PFS.
Results
Nineteen of 37 patients were enrolled to arm A, and 18 of 37 patients were enrolled to arm B. There was no incidence of any grade of HSRs in both groups. The incidence of severe venous pain (grade 3) based on WHO classification between arm A and arm B were 16% and 39%, respectively (relative risk 0.41, 95% CI 0.12-1.33, P-value=0.114). The mean change of venous pain score between arm A and arm B based on numerical rating scale (NRS) were 5.01 and 5.64, respectively (P-value=0.402). There were no differences in ORR, PFS and common adverse events between two groups.
Conclusions
There was no incidence of any grade of HSRs between groups, so we could not conclude that using the Y-site co-infusion of oxaliplatin and dexamethasone was effective than standard premedication with intravenous dexamethasone for preventing HSRs from oxaliplatin administration. However, an incidence of severe venous pain may be reduced via through Y-site co-infusion of oxaliplatin and dexamethasone.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The Institutional Review Board of Royal Thai Army Medical Department (IRBRTA R194h/64).
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
602P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (Enco) + binimetinib (Bini) vs vemurafenib (Vemu) or Enco in patients (Pts) with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Andrew Haydon
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
603P - An individualised postoperative radiological surveillance schedule for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients (HK-GBM Registry)
Presenter: Jason Chak Yan Li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
604P - Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Outcomes from COSMIC-311 by BRAF status
Presenter: Marcia Brose
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
606P - BRAF and NRAS mutations are associated with poor prognosis in Asians with acral-lentiginous and nodular cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
607P - Single institutional outcomes of radiotherapy and systemic therapy for melanoma brain metastases in Japan
Presenter: Naoya Yamazaki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
608P - The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in mucosal melanomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Andrea Teo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
609P - The association between thyroid function abnormalities and vitiligo induced by pembrolizumab regarding prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma
Presenter: Moez Mobarek
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
610P - Analyzing the clinical benefit of the evidence presented at these congresses and utilizing a standardized scale to quantify it will significantly enhance our understanding of the studies showcased, allowing for more objective evaluation and interpretation
Presenter: Charles Jeffrey Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
611P - ESMO-magnitude of clinical benefit scale (MCBS) scores for phase III trials of adjuvant and curative therapies at the 2022 ASCO annual meeting (ASCO22)
Presenter: Thi Thao Vi Luong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
612P - Is the juice worth the squeeze? Overall survival gain per unit treatment time as a metric of clinical benefit of systemic treatment in incurable cancers
Presenter: Vodathi Bamunuarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract