Abstract 292P
Background
Cervical cancer is the second most common malignancy among women in poor countries, according to the World Health Organization. According to some writers, cervical cancer is the second- or third-leading cause of mortality for women over 30 in Uzbekistan. Statistics on cervical cancer are hotly debated because not all women visit a doctor. On the pathologist's table, the diagnosis is frequently made.
Methods
During a regular checkup, 92 women between the ages of 25 and 48 were seen at the antenatal clinic of hospital No. 1g. Using liquid cytology and Pap test technologies, a screening cytological examination was performed on all women. According to clinical recommendations, the PAP test classes were interpreted as follows: class 1 — normal; class 2 — inflammatory type; class 3 — dyskaryosis; class 4 — cells suggestive for cancer or carcinoma; and class 5 — malignancy.
Results
50 women had normal cytological screening results from Pap tests, while 36 had inflammatory type outcomes. There was an inadequate type of sample in 6 women. A negative result of cytological screening by liquid cytology was found in 44 women; 36 women had cytograms that were within the normal range; and 10 women had atypical cells of stratified squamous epithelium that were of unknown significance. Additionally, 2 women developed epithelial squamous lesions of low severity. Compared to liquid cytology, which had a sensitivity of 77.0%, the Pap test had a sensitivity of 33.0%. While liquid cytology had a specificity of 72.0%, the Pap test had a higher specificity of 87.0%. Liquid cytology and the predictive value of a positive Pap test were comparable. Compared to the PAP test, the liquid cytology test had a better predictive value for a negative outcome.
Conclusions
The study's findings revealed that both approaches to early cervical cancer diagnosis estimate the incidence of the condition equally. In addition, liquid cytology makes it more probable to produce a positive result in the group of patients who actually have the disease and, to a lesser extent, in those who do not. When employing the liquid cytology method, the prognosis of the likelihood of the disease being absent in patients with a negative result was higher.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
602P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (Enco) + binimetinib (Bini) vs vemurafenib (Vemu) or Enco in patients (Pts) with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Andrew Haydon
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
603P - An individualised postoperative radiological surveillance schedule for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients (HK-GBM Registry)
Presenter: Jason Chak Yan Li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
604P - Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Outcomes from COSMIC-311 by BRAF status
Presenter: Marcia Brose
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
606P - BRAF and NRAS mutations are associated with poor prognosis in Asians with acral-lentiginous and nodular cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
607P - Single institutional outcomes of radiotherapy and systemic therapy for melanoma brain metastases in Japan
Presenter: Naoya Yamazaki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
608P - The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in mucosal melanomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Andrea Teo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
609P - The association between thyroid function abnormalities and vitiligo induced by pembrolizumab regarding prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma
Presenter: Moez Mobarek
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
610P - Analyzing the clinical benefit of the evidence presented at these congresses and utilizing a standardized scale to quantify it will significantly enhance our understanding of the studies showcased, allowing for more objective evaluation and interpretation
Presenter: Charles Jeffrey Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
611P - ESMO-magnitude of clinical benefit scale (MCBS) scores for phase III trials of adjuvant and curative therapies at the 2022 ASCO annual meeting (ASCO22)
Presenter: Thi Thao Vi Luong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
612P - Is the juice worth the squeeze? Overall survival gain per unit treatment time as a metric of clinical benefit of systemic treatment in incurable cancers
Presenter: Vodathi Bamunuarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract