Abstract 244P
Background
Non clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) refers to a rare diverse heterogeneous group of tumors; usually treated with immunotherapy (IO) and or tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). Prospective large-scale data from Asia specific countries is limited. We aimed to present the demographic profile and treatment outcome of nccRCC patients from single centre in India.
Methods
This is a retrospective study on patients with metastatic nccRCC treated at Tata Medical Centre, Kolkata-West Bengal from 2012-2022. Demographic profiles, histologic subtypes, treatment details, response to therapy (by RECIST v1.1) and survival status were captured from electronic medical records of hospitals up till March 2023. Progression free survival (PFS) and Overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan Meier method.
Results
A total of 89 patients were screened;24 excluded due to inadequate records. 65 patients were included in analysis, with a median age at diagnosis of 59 years (range 20-84). Histologic subtypes comprised 43% (n=28) papillary, 31%(n=20) clear cell with mixed histology, 3%(2) sarcomatoid & 23%(15) others including chromophobe, oncocytoma. The most common site of metastasis was lung 62% (n=40).15% presented with haematuria and 62%(n=40) underwent cytoreductive nephrectomy. Majority received pazopanib 46% (n=30) then chemotherapy 20% (n=13) including bevacizumab plus erlotinib, sunitinib 15%(10), cabozantinib 14%(9). Only 3(5%) received IO plus TKI combination. The best response was CR in 1.5%, PR 20%, SD 51% & PD 23% as per RECIST v1.1. Total 17 (26%) patients required dose reduction & interruption due to adverse effects & 33% received second-line therapy with nivolumab,axitinib & everolimus were commonly used. After a median follow up of 44 months; median PFS was 13 months (95%CI 7.2-18.9) & median OS was 17 months (95%CI 12.1-22.1). Regression analysis identified better outcome for PFS & OS with sarcomatoid subtype & those underwent prior nephrectomy.
Conclusions
The overall response and survival was quite impressive in comparison with published data; despite limited number of cases treated with IO due to its cost.This study also highlighted better survival with sarcomatoid subtype and prior nephrectomy.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
602P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (Enco) + binimetinib (Bini) vs vemurafenib (Vemu) or Enco in patients (Pts) with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Andrew Haydon
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
603P - An individualised postoperative radiological surveillance schedule for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients (HK-GBM Registry)
Presenter: Jason Chak Yan Li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
604P - Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Outcomes from COSMIC-311 by BRAF status
Presenter: Marcia Brose
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
606P - BRAF and NRAS mutations are associated with poor prognosis in Asians with acral-lentiginous and nodular cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
607P - Single institutional outcomes of radiotherapy and systemic therapy for melanoma brain metastases in Japan
Presenter: Naoya Yamazaki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
608P - The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in mucosal melanomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Andrea Teo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
609P - The association between thyroid function abnormalities and vitiligo induced by pembrolizumab regarding prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma
Presenter: Moez Mobarek
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
610P - Analyzing the clinical benefit of the evidence presented at these congresses and utilizing a standardized scale to quantify it will significantly enhance our understanding of the studies showcased, allowing for more objective evaluation and interpretation
Presenter: Charles Jeffrey Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
611P - ESMO-magnitude of clinical benefit scale (MCBS) scores for phase III trials of adjuvant and curative therapies at the 2022 ASCO annual meeting (ASCO22)
Presenter: Thi Thao Vi Luong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
612P - Is the juice worth the squeeze? Overall survival gain per unit treatment time as a metric of clinical benefit of systemic treatment in incurable cancers
Presenter: Vodathi Bamunuarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract