Abstract 25P
Background
With the advent of novel antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), an emerging subgroup of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low breast cancer has been recognized which may take advantage from the anti-tumor activity. We took advantage of Taiwan Cancer Registry (TCR) to evaluate the clinical presentations and prognostication for HER2-low breast cancer.
Methods
HER2-low breast cancers were defined operationally with HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) 1+ or 2+ with a negative fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) while HER2-zero defined with an IHC score 0. Breast cancer index cases (n=189465) from TCR between 2007 and 2017 were reduced to 133546 sides of breast cancer per subject. Clinical features such as IHC test, stage, grade and outcomes such as relapse-free and overall survival were compared between HER2-low and HER2-zero.
Results
The safety analysis group comprised 37195 HER2-negative breast cancers, including 14288 IHC 1+, 10486 FISH-negative, 8907 IHC 0 and 3323 IHC 2+/FISH-undetermined cases. Among HER2-negative breast cancers, the proportion of HER2-low and HER2-zero was 68.9% and 31.1%, respectively, after excluding HER2 ambiguity. Overall survival was 95.7% versus 95.9% for HER2-low and HER2-zero breast cancers, which was 94.1% and 94.7% for relapse-free survival. The distributions of pathological stages from 0 to IV were 6.7%, 41.5%, 38.5%, 13.1% and 0.3% for HER2-low and were 8.5%, 42.8%, 37.5%, 11% and 0.4% for HER2-zero breast cancers. Regarding estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) status, 87.6% and 80.9% of the HER2-low cases were ER+ and PR+ while 81.9% and 74.8% of the HER2-zero patients were ER+ and PR+. High or poorly differentiated grade was reported from 23.4% of HER2-low and 25.5% of HER2-zero breast cancers. The diagnosed age was 54 versus 54.3 between HER2-low and HER2-zero breast cancers (P=0.02).
Conclusions
HER2-low status is not a prognostic marker for Taiwanese breast cancers while a slightly younger age of disease onset, less than half diagnosed with stage 0 and I, more ER and PR positivity and fewer grade III disease were observed for HER2-low phenotype compared with HER2-zero counterpart. These trivial differences distinguished HER2-low from HER2-zero spectrum among Taiwanese HER2-negative breast cancers.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
LMT.
Funding
Melissa Lee Cancer Foundation.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
602P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (Enco) + binimetinib (Bini) vs vemurafenib (Vemu) or Enco in patients (Pts) with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Andrew Haydon
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
603P - An individualised postoperative radiological surveillance schedule for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients (HK-GBM Registry)
Presenter: Jason Chak Yan Li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
604P - Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Outcomes from COSMIC-311 by BRAF status
Presenter: Marcia Brose
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
606P - BRAF and NRAS mutations are associated with poor prognosis in Asians with acral-lentiginous and nodular cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
607P - Single institutional outcomes of radiotherapy and systemic therapy for melanoma brain metastases in Japan
Presenter: Naoya Yamazaki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
608P - The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in mucosal melanomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Andrea Teo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
609P - The association between thyroid function abnormalities and vitiligo induced by pembrolizumab regarding prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma
Presenter: Moez Mobarek
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
610P - Analyzing the clinical benefit of the evidence presented at these congresses and utilizing a standardized scale to quantify it will significantly enhance our understanding of the studies showcased, allowing for more objective evaluation and interpretation
Presenter: Charles Jeffrey Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
611P - ESMO-magnitude of clinical benefit scale (MCBS) scores for phase III trials of adjuvant and curative therapies at the 2022 ASCO annual meeting (ASCO22)
Presenter: Thi Thao Vi Luong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
612P - Is the juice worth the squeeze? Overall survival gain per unit treatment time as a metric of clinical benefit of systemic treatment in incurable cancers
Presenter: Vodathi Bamunuarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract