Abstract 163P
Background
Gall Bladder Cancers(GBC) comprise a feared entity among all oncologists. Advanced stage of disease at presentation and grave prognosis despite use of all the armamentarium has led to GBC patients faring worse than other sites of malignancy.The goal of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of chemotherapy alone versus radiotherapy alone in patients with locally advanced unresectable gallbladder carcinoma.
Methods
This was a randomized control study done in Regional Institute of Medical Sciences, Imphal, Manipur from 1st August 2017 to 31st July 2019. All histopathologically confirmed locally advanced unresectable carcinoma gall bladder patients were enrolled in this study. Patients who refused to give consent, metastatic disease and Child Pugh Score C were excluded. Patients who received any treatment for obstructiion was also excluded from the study. All patients were randomized into two arms. In Arm A, patients were treated with palliative chemotherapy and in Arm B patients received external beam radiotherapy. Treatment response of both radiotherapy and chemotherapy were assessed using RECIST Criteria Version1.1. Early radiation toxicity was assessed during treatment using RTOG grading. Chemotherapy toxicity was assessed using NCI-CTCAE Criteria (version 4.03). The study was carried out after obtaining approval from the Research Ethics Board. Written informed consent was taken from all the patients before enrolment of the study.
Results
Baseline characteristics of patients are listed in the table. Symptomatic response after one month of treatment in chemotherapy and radiotherapy arm were 80.7% and 61.4%. Overall response rate in chemotherapy arm was 38.4% in chemotherapy arm while 26.8% in radiotherapy arm. Median progression free survival in chemotherapy and radiotherapy arm were 7.24 vs 6.11 months (p= 0.034) respectively. Table: 163P
Chemotherapy arm (n=30) | Radiotherapy arm (n=30) | |
Median age | 61 years | 61 years |
Gender | ||
Male | 6 (20%) | 4 (13.3%) |
Female | 24 (80%) | 26 (86.7%) |
KPS | ||
>80% | 13 (43.3%) | 13 (43.3%) |
<60% | 17 (56.66%) | 17 (56.66%) |
History of cholelithiasis | 19 (63.3%) | 20 (66.7%) |
Clinical presentation | ||
Jaundice | 7 (23%) | 10 (33%) |
Abdominal pain | 6 (20%) | 7 (23%) |
Abdominal mass | 2 (7%) | 9 (30%) |
Ascites | 10 (33%) | 0 |
Nausea/vomit | 5 (17%) | 4 (13%) |
Stage | ||
IIIA | 7 (11.7%) | 5 (8.7%) |
IIIB | 13 (21.7%) | 12 (20%) |
IV | 10 (16.7%) | 13 (21.7%) |
Response | ||
Complete response | 1 (3.8%) | 1 (3.8%) |
Partial response | 9 (34.6%) | 6 (23%) |
Stable disease | 11 (42.3%) | 9 (34.6%) |
Progressive disease | 5 (19.2%) | 10 (38.4%) |
Conclusions
In advanced inoperable gallbladder cancer chemotherapy has better response rates and survival outcomes compared to radiotherapy.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
153P - IMbrave150: Exploratory analyses for investigating associations between overall survival (OS) and depth of response (DpR) or duration of response (DoR) in patients (pts) with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)
Presenter: Masatoshi Kudo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
154P - Adverse events (AEs) as potential predictive factors of activity in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (AB)
Presenter: Mara Persano
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
155P - Penpulimab combined with anlotinib and nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (PAAG) as first-line treatment for advanced metastatic pancreatic cancer: A prospective, multicenter, single-arm, phase II study
Presenter: Juan Du
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
156P - Phase II trial of second-line regorafenib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma after progression on first-line atezolizumab plus bevacizumab: REGONEXT trial
Presenter: Jaekyung Cheon
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
157P - T/N ratio and radiation dose delivered do not correlate with the development of Radioembolization-Induced Liver Disease (REILD) in Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) following Y90 selective internal radiation therapy (Y90-SIRT): A retrospective, single tertiary centre cohort study
Presenter: Daniel Yang Yao Peh
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
158P - Single-cell RNA sequencing via Endoscopic Ultrasoundguided Fine-Needle Biopsy (EUS-FNB) Pancreatic Biopsies uncovered an aggressive subclone with a poor prognosis
Presenter: Yung-yeh Su
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
159P - Classical computer vision and modern deep-learning of pancreatic stroma histology features to diagnose cancer
Presenter: Abdelhakim Khellaf
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
160P - Interim analysis of the NAPOLEON-2 study: Safety evaluation of nano-liposomal irinotecan with fluorouracil and folinic acid for advanced pancreatic cancer
Presenter: Wataru Kusano
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
161P - Screening and COnsensus based on Practices and Evidence (SCOPE): Real-world survey on Japanese and rest-of-world practice patterns in resectable pancreatic cancer
Presenter: Elizabeth Smyth
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
162P - Recurrence pattern of hepatocellular carcinoma patients receiving curative surgery of RFA: An update
Presenter: Long Chan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract