Abstract 192P
Background
Studies of apatinib monotherapy suggest that ARAE (proteinuria, hand-foot syndrome [HFS] and hypertension) may predict clinical outcomes in patients with AGC; however, this phenomenon has not been reported in patients receiving apatinib + chemotherapy. We evaluated the potential association between ARAE and efficacy outcomes of apatinib +chemotherapy for AGC.
Methods
We reviewed two prospective trials of patients treated with apatinib + chemotherapy (POF or paclitaxel alone), a phase II study (ESMO-ASIA 2018) and a phase I study (ESMO 2022). POF was paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 over 3 h followed by leucovorin 400 mg/m2 and oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 over 2 h; then 5-FU 2,400 mg/m2 continuous infusion over 46 h. Drugs were started days 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle. Paclitaxel alone was 80 mg/m2 days 1, 8, and 15 of every 28-day cycle. Presence of any ARAE in the first 4 weeks of therapy was assessed and the primary outcome was overall survival (OS). OS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier with the log-rank test. Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated by univariate and multivariate Cox proportional regression models.
Results
The number of participants was 43 (POF, n=41; paclitaxel alone, n=2). In the first 4 weeks of treatment, 22 (51.2%) had any grade proteinuria, 13 (30.0%) had any grade HFS, and 14 (32.6%) had any grade hypertension. The presence of proteinuria or HFS was associated with prolonged median OS ([months] proteinuria 5.93 vs. 19.10; HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.20-0.79; P=0.0065; HFS 8.92 vs. 22.57 ; HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.23-0.98; P=0.04) and progression-free survival ([PFS] proteinuria 3.50 vs. 9.60 ; HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.23-0.91; P=0.022; HFS 6.40 vs. 10.67 ; HR 0.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.27-1.07; P=0.073 ). 24 (55.8%) patients had one (any grade) proteinuria or HFS in the first 4 weeks, which was associated with prolonged median OS (6.77 vs. 16.35 ; HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.24-0.93; P=0.031) and PFS (4.20 vs. 8.75; HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.28-1.08; P=0.080).
Conclusions
Antiangiogenesis-related proteinuria and HFS may be biomarkers to predict antitumor efficacy of apatinib + chemotherapy in AGC. Future prospective studies are needed to validate findings.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
602P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (Enco) + binimetinib (Bini) vs vemurafenib (Vemu) or Enco in patients (Pts) with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Andrew Haydon
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
603P - An individualised postoperative radiological surveillance schedule for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients (HK-GBM Registry)
Presenter: Jason Chak Yan Li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
604P - Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Outcomes from COSMIC-311 by BRAF status
Presenter: Marcia Brose
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
606P - BRAF and NRAS mutations are associated with poor prognosis in Asians with acral-lentiginous and nodular cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
607P - Single institutional outcomes of radiotherapy and systemic therapy for melanoma brain metastases in Japan
Presenter: Naoya Yamazaki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
608P - The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in mucosal melanomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Andrea Teo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
609P - The association between thyroid function abnormalities and vitiligo induced by pembrolizumab regarding prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma
Presenter: Moez Mobarek
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
610P - Analyzing the clinical benefit of the evidence presented at these congresses and utilizing a standardized scale to quantify it will significantly enhance our understanding of the studies showcased, allowing for more objective evaluation and interpretation
Presenter: Charles Jeffrey Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
611P - ESMO-magnitude of clinical benefit scale (MCBS) scores for phase III trials of adjuvant and curative therapies at the 2022 ASCO annual meeting (ASCO22)
Presenter: Thi Thao Vi Luong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
612P - Is the juice worth the squeeze? Overall survival gain per unit treatment time as a metric of clinical benefit of systemic treatment in incurable cancers
Presenter: Vodathi Bamunuarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract