Abstract 143P
Background
The combination of local thermal ablation with immune checkpoint inhibitors perioperatively for small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is yet to be explored. The aim of this phase II trial was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of thermal ablation in combination with tislelizumab, an anti-PD-1 antibody, in patients with HCC of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage A or B, and to make a preliminary evaluation of the efficacy of this treatment modality.
Methods
This phase II trial (NCT04652440) enrolled newly diagnosed and recurrent HCC patients with 1 or 2 lesions of 2-5 cm in size. This study included two stages. The first stage included 6 patients for dose-limited toxicity (DLT) observation. Only if DLT appeared in < 2 patients, the other 24 patients would be included. Enrolled patients received the first dose of tislelizumab intravenously within 1 day before percutaneous thermal ablation, followed by infusions every 3 weeks for totally 4 doses. The primary endpoints were safety and tolerability. Secondary endpoints included the rate of complete response by first ablation (CR1), local recurrence rate, distant metastasis rate, and 1- and 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates.
Results
No DLT occurred in the first 6 patients, and the study completed recruiting a total 30 subjects in July 2023. Twenty-six subjects had already finished their study treatment and were followed regularly. One patient withdrew her informed consent after completion of the ablation and the first dose of study medication. The other 3 were still on tislelizumab therapy. Until the time of data cut-off (July 30, 2023), the most common adverse events were increased alanine aminotransferase (N=15) and aspartate aminotransferase (N=19) on the first day after ablation. The majority recovered after supportive treatment. 10 patients experienced grade 1-2 immune-related adverse events (irAEs), the most common were rash (N=8), pruritus (N=5), and anorexia (N=4). No ≥3 grade irAEs occurred.
Conclusions
Thermal ablation combined with tislelizumab showed acceptable safety and tolerability with no unexpected SAEs observed. Results of efficacy will be disclosed in future.
Clinical trial identification
NCT04652440.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
602P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (Enco) + binimetinib (Bini) vs vemurafenib (Vemu) or Enco in patients (Pts) with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Andrew Haydon
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
603P - An individualised postoperative radiological surveillance schedule for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients (HK-GBM Registry)
Presenter: Jason Chak Yan Li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
604P - Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Outcomes from COSMIC-311 by BRAF status
Presenter: Marcia Brose
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
606P - BRAF and NRAS mutations are associated with poor prognosis in Asians with acral-lentiginous and nodular cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
607P - Single institutional outcomes of radiotherapy and systemic therapy for melanoma brain metastases in Japan
Presenter: Naoya Yamazaki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
608P - The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in mucosal melanomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Andrea Teo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
609P - The association between thyroid function abnormalities and vitiligo induced by pembrolizumab regarding prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma
Presenter: Moez Mobarek
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
610P - Analyzing the clinical benefit of the evidence presented at these congresses and utilizing a standardized scale to quantify it will significantly enhance our understanding of the studies showcased, allowing for more objective evaluation and interpretation
Presenter: Charles Jeffrey Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
611P - ESMO-magnitude of clinical benefit scale (MCBS) scores for phase III trials of adjuvant and curative therapies at the 2022 ASCO annual meeting (ASCO22)
Presenter: Thi Thao Vi Luong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
612P - Is the juice worth the squeeze? Overall survival gain per unit treatment time as a metric of clinical benefit of systemic treatment in incurable cancers
Presenter: Vodathi Bamunuarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract